Because according to your logic Ostheer can't cope vs LV with regular snare range
Yet as I and others have pointed out OKW have less options to deal with UC and similar early LV yet have no extra snare bonus.
So why exactly should ost not be brought into line?
As said they already have Inc rounds/teller/regular fausts to deal with a wasp or m3 before 222 hits. The four man argument just doesn't hold water when grens are arguably better early game than pfuss.
German infantry man doctrine is basically broken in 1s with all the buffs and perks grens have kept.
So you're comparing a defensiv minded faction with no LT and an AT available in T2 to a faction with cheeper AT available in T0 and a non-doc puma?
Plus those faction doesn't work the same way at all.
Plus:
-Inc rounds: Vet 1 ability on static weapon which does no damage on LT
-teller: Do I really need to explain why mine are really situational and map dependant?
-regular fausts: a faction well-known to have hard time countering LT with the current faust and you want to nerf it for the sake of "making it in line with ally factions because it is how work an assymetrical game after all"
Getting hit twice by the same section, whether it was an Ostruppen or a Gren, is your fault, since both are weak section which shouldn't be able to rush a tank. Plus neither of them have access to sprint ability unlike cons with "urah".
And stop trying to argue that a unit is OP thanks to a doctrine, that's as stupid as saying "cons AT nades are fcking OP because the volley of the TANK-HUNTER commander do to much damages"
And for those who think that grens and Ostruppen are not weak sections, let's make a quick comparison:
Grenadier Target size: 0.91 Infantry Section Target size: 0.8
Grenadier vet 3 Target size: 0.7 Infantry Section Vet 3 Target size: 0.62
(and they have acces to Bolster non-doc and keep their 2 weapons slot)
Ostruppen Target size: 1.25 Conscript Target size: 1.09
Ostruppen vet 3 Target size: 0.89 Conscript vet 3 Target size: 0.71
Data from:
https://coh2db.com/stats/#70