Profile of insaneHoshi

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 911

General Information
Steam: 76561197989687200


Thread: M36 Jackson10 Jun 2019, 19:55 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Jun 2019, 19:45 PMKatitof different application Different application = different intended role. Unless of course you admit that "intended role" is just something you are making up, as you did not develop this game and thus actually dont know what the devs "intended" In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M36 Jackson10 Jun 2019, 18:56 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Jun 2019, 18:15 PMKatitof You've confused intended role of the unit with how its supposed to do it. Presence of turret doesn't make jackson have different role then SU-85, both are intended to hardcounter everything that isn't an infantry and both are vulnerable to a flank(just one can attempt to defend itself, but it'll still die as P4 shoots faster and panther will outlast it without any effort). Ah the mythical "intended role" that you use to wave away at any over/under performing unit. Wasn't the last time I checked, the "intended role" of a m36 was to be a 480 HP glass cannon? And I dont know if you have actually used a tank with a turret (since you dont play the game) but having one absurdly adds to the role of a unit. Apart from the fact that a turret with a fast rotation speed (unlike the FF) makes flaking mildly pointless, having a turret adds this thing called maneuverability, useful when chasing tanks and performing flanks itself. > Jump back to quoted post10 Jun 2019, 18:46 PMLago It'll also lose to its weight in light AT vehicles. Two Pumas vs a M36 may win, but the Jackson still outrages the puma, is as fast and has better accuracy. I don't think there is anything two pumas can do to chase down and kill a Jackson if inf or AT support is in reverse range. I dont think building pumas vs a Jackson is a sustainable trade to be making. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M36 Jackson10 Jun 2019, 16:45 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jun 2019, 08:47 AMKatitof So are MGs. Yet for some incomprehensible reason, infantry in HMG range is obsolete and can't do anything. Thats absolutely untrue. Apart from the fact that late game blobs can delete HMGs with LMGs, HMGs only counter infantry of course in its arc. If you were actually to make the HMG/M36 analogy fair, you would have to give the HMG a 360 degree arc or the m36 a cone like a casemate TD. Thus a 360 degree hmg would be op in the same way a TD that counters everything in its 360 degree arc is OP. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: KV1 and Churchill can take too much damage5 Jun 2019, 16:12 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jun 2019, 15:51 PMLago A Panther's a hard counter. It always wins that fight. Soft counters are stuff like blowing up a T-70 with panzerfausts. A Su-76 always wins the fight vs a KT, is a Su-76 a hard counter to the KT? How "hard" a counter must take more into account than just if it wins in a 1 v 1 fight. IMO right now the panther doesn't have the requisite DPS to stop the Churchill from driving up, throwing a grenade on a weapon team, and reversing back to base. Sure the Church would die if it stayed in the fight and would take damage, but it has fulfilled its objective of killing a unit. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: British base smoke barrage30 May 2019, 23:49 PM It would make much more sense for smoke flares and barrage to be mutually exclusive upgrades. But this would probably have to be balanced by something as its not like UKF are the worst faction anymore, who can now bolster blob to victory. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What is better?30 May 2019, 07:20 AM At what? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Some change for Consript27 May 2019, 16:16 PM Jump back to quoted post27 May 2019, 13:01 PMKatitof But... you don't want maxims to be viable, you don't want cons to be viable, but you want to nerf penals so there is "diversity"? How is that supposed to work? OKW have crapload of infantry to rely on to take weight off volks, both stock and doctrinally. What's supposed to actually work in soviet army if you break penals legs and cons and maxims already are on wheelchairs? Do you exist in a world where a unit can only fit into two possibilities, OP and UP? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: KV1 and Churchill can take too much damage21 May 2019, 20:18 PM Jump back to quoted post21 May 2019, 20:15 PMinsaneHoshi What about JT and Ele, which he also mentioned? You forgot about them already? The sentence wasn't that long. People still build JT and Ele? Jump back to quoted post21 May 2019, 19:00 PMKatitof Other heavy tanks have TREMENDOUS frontal armor and main gun that no med can stand up against. Last time I've checked, Churchills and KV-1s weren't deflecting up to 60% of ATG shots at max range nor were they penning all medium vehicles with 100% chance. Sure, but why does that mean that flanking shouldn't be rewarded? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: KV1 and Churchill can take too much damage21 May 2019, 20:15 PM Jump back to quoted post21 May 2019, 20:09 PMKatitof What about JT and Ele, which he also mentioned? You forgot about them already? The sentence wasn't that long. People still build JT and Ele? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: KV1 and Churchill can take too much damage21 May 2019, 06:39 AM Jump back to quoted post21 May 2019, 06:25 AMMr Carmine A wel supported kv or churchill however is hard to flank. But so are tigers kt`s panthers etc. But due to its high rear armour, kv or Churchill are still harder to flank In: COH2 Balance