Profile of aerafield

Jump back to quoted post17 Aug 2022, 07:56 AMHannibal

Your ELO was higher than the enemy team's. The ELO estimate expected you to win, but you lost. Therefore, you get a "high" penalty and downranked.

Second game, your ELO and the enemy team's ELO are more closely matched. The game is closer to 50:50, therefore you don't get as much of a bonus if you win.

Basically, everything working as intended.

The same thing occurs if your ELO was always higher than the ELO of the enemy team (which, if I get you right, probably was not the case). Then you get penalized for losing, but don't gain much from winning since you were expected to win in the first place. Also here, everything working as intended.

Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2022, 13:24 PMBasedSecretary

With relic there is no guarantee of that

Jump back to quoted post4 Aug 2022, 13:34 PMPatFenis

Actually that is an interesting subject. As I see it, its a gentlemens agreement not to do that because its really cheap and not intended.

If its a bannable offense is another question, my heart says yes. But I dont know where relic stands on that subject.

Jump back to quoted post5 Aug 2022, 22:57 PMrumartinez89

Well that is rather sad, I personally tend to avoid Guards because their AT+button just seemed to make everything to easy. I didn't know they were performing so well. Gonk made another comparing different LMG squads vs Obers and Airborne LMG performed the worse. That just seems absurd for the price and muni cost along with lack of utility. The fact that guards were able to win seems to be a really big miss from the balance team, them winning 50% of the time was asinine.

Things like this really do reinforce the perception that specific builds and commanders were favored when balancing the game.

Sorry for rant.

Jump back to quoted post1 Aug 2022, 02:06 AMRosbone

Literally the next game:

RELIC

SUCKS