Profile of LuGer33

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 174

General Information


Thread: Relic says: Something BIG after the brits...28 Sep 2015, 01:00 AM Well we're coming up on a month here since UKF dropped. We already got the big first balance patch and since it'll be months before Relic fixes leIGs and any other issue, hopefully this "huge news" drops sooner rather than later. In: Lobby
Thread: Volk throw their incendiary grenade too quickly18 Sep 2015, 23:07 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2015, 08:32 AMUGBEAR Meanwhile you needs to spend money to teach conscript to throw their molotov...... Perfect balance, BTW, non-doc T-34/85 for real? UKF, USF, and SU all have to buy the grenade upgrade separately which obviously means delayed teching. OKW gets SU super molotovs on steorids as a... reward for teching? I honestly don't know how this gets in the game. "They need help clearing buildings." OK, Americans need help clearing MGs without a mortar so we're forced to... you guessed it... BUY GRENADES. But hey, let's give these super duper murderous flame nades to OKW for free, and make them OP as shit and broken while we're at it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Base Reorganization Concept12 Sep 2015, 18:12 PM Far better than the current design. Looks more functional as well. Relic - we get it. USF is supposed to be mobile and aggressive. Doesn't mean the base needs to be in the shape of a wheel. In: Lobby
Thread: Post your duplicates9 Sep 2015, 05:47 AM This is a dumb question I'm sure has been asked and answered many times, but do duplicate bulletins stack? I have a handful of "Riflemen gain veterancy 10% faster" and I'd love to pile those on and have my rifles vet 30% faster when the September patch drops and buffs Vet 3 rifles. In: Lobby
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/08/20159 Sep 2015, 05:33 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 18:25 PMCookiezNcreem Why do you guys insist on turning heavies into these counter-all vehicles all the sudden. Weren't we working away from a heavy tank meta.. There is no reason give heavy tanks longer ranges to deal with tank destroyers. Tank destroyers are supposed to kite heavy tanks. Is that not obvious? To deal with this,you support your heavy tank with 50-60 range units... The KT literally does not need this. Just park a Jp4(which flat out beats SU85s and jacksons) right next to it.. Same with tiger,even though its harder since they lack a 60 range TD(SO BUFF THE STUG TO BE INLINE WITH OTHER FACTIONS 60 RANGE TD's,NOT THE TIGER. #JustRelicBalancing),park double paks,or a couple stugs with a halftrack to reinforce paks that were hit by artillery. I dont understand. Please dont put this in live. And if youre planning on giving a pershing(when its added) 45-50 range,please reconsider. Its only moving towards taking away from late game combined arms. The other changes are +1 btw,but why go 4-5 steps forward and 1 step back. +10 or however many people have agreed with this post. I don't understand how "Tigers die too easily to tank destroyers" is even an issue. The Jackson is the only unit USF has to deal w/ these heavily armored, late-game Axis units, whether they be Tigers or Panthers or whatever. To that end, I thought they were a hard counter. I mean, lawd knows Zooks and 57 mm rounds are just gonna bounce off left and right. So what's the actual rationale behind this proposed change? Who at the office is saying "USF has too strong of a late game" or "[either Axis faction] needs help killing USF armor." Because I haven't seen anyone say it here. In: Lobby
Thread: All recent LEAKS in one mega-post :relicleaks:7 Sep 2015, 21:26 PM To all the people who say "Relic is greedy, money grubbing, BS DLC practices," etc., basically the one counter-point is the lack of a Pershing commander for the first year. I think when it finally drops, hopefully sooner rather than later, it'll definitely be the fastest selling commander ever and probably the best selling after a few weeks. In: Lobby
Thread: Wasp Overpowered7 Sep 2015, 07:16 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Sep 2015, 07:05 AMEsxile The only problem is it kill way too fast, range isn't an issue but damage his. At this point of time, you don't even have time to micro anything, models die in a matter of seconds. Kinda like playing as USF. All Flamer damage is going down in the next patch though. It's gonna be exactly as you asked... less damage and instant slaughter but longer burning / more area denial. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/04/20156 Sep 2015, 22:11 PM I haven't seen a single person say the 600% increase in cooldown between Brace is a good idea. I do hope Relic reconsiders and goes down to 60 seconds or something more reasonable (if they haven't changed their minds already). In: Lobby
Thread: the end of 3v3 and 4v46 Sep 2015, 19:19 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2015, 04:18 AMJadame! I don't want to be salty, but.. NO MORE EASY WINS FOR AXIS LMAO. It's pretty remarkable. There are absolutely British units that need a nerf like the Bofors (everyone agrees) and some of the specialist Churchhills, but I think your average Axis players are baffled that they can't just attack + move straight at an Allied position and kill everything w/ their Shrek blobs and armor. Had an OKW player crying at the end of a match this morning about how "BRITS RUINED THIS GAME, I HATE RELIC, IT'LL TAKE MONTHS TO FIX." What made it great was he had x3 4% faster ISG reload bulletins + the Sturm officer and built 3 ISGs to deal w/ Brit emplacements, and he went up against me (USF) and a teammate (UKF) who didn't even build emplacements, but rushed to Churchhills (backed up by Jacksons) and it was GG. So he got completely outplayed but lost his shit about the Brits being OP anyway. Funny stuff. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Premium british commanders2 Sep 2015, 23:49 PM Unbelievably I got one of the Brit premium commanders in a drop after my first game. In: Lobby