Profile of SpaceHamster

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 474

General Information


Thread: Nobody plays Axis...22 Oct 2015, 07:10 AM Playing brits just feels like playing a better version of ostheer. And by better, I mean having 50%+ accuracy similar stats to pak40 at guns better. Don't even get me started on received accuracy buffs on those IS's. In: Lobby
Thread: Relic Stream - October 2121 Oct 2015, 21:44 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Oct 2015, 21:03 PMAngryKitten465 Ah more Tanks hard countering their hardcounter by throwing a grenade at them that is cooked (maximum of one second fuse). Good job Relic, this gonna be hella fun Just run up to the pershing into its grenade range and panzerfaust it In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Pershing 21 Oct 2015, 19:36 PM A tank is not necessarily bad at AI if it goes fast enough to crush infantry with its tracks. AKA: M10. In: Lobby
Thread: Relic Stream - October 2121 Oct 2015, 19:18 PM Still wondering how much of an accuracy bonus does combined arms give to infantry near tanks. If it's anywhere near the level of heroic charge/command aura for brits though... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Relic Stream - October 2121 Oct 2015, 18:41 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Oct 2015, 18:39 PMOmega_Warrior Brad said Rangers had 4 weapon slots. That means you could put 4x bars/zooks on them too. Jump back to quoted post21 Oct 2015, 18:39 PMOmega_Warrior That means you could put 4x bars/zooks on them too. Jump back to quoted post21 Oct 2015, 18:39 PMOmega_Warrior 4x bars Oh yesh. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Relic Stream - October 2121 Oct 2015, 18:16 PM So I can finally do proper callin meta if I don't tech to major and just save that 120 + 100 something fuel for the pershing. Oh, and ranger thompsons(wonder if they have tactical assault as well). Edit: nvm, just watched. Rangers don't get anything like that even with vet. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: [OKW] [1vs1] [Mechanized HQ Flak Halftrack fuel cost]20 Oct 2015, 16:11 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Oct 2015, 15:37 PMOmega_Warrior This is a terrible argument. A buff to one unit in one faction is not a reason to buff a totally different unit. I'm not even sure if I'm against a buff, but you are going to have to do a lot better to convince me then that. Well, what about the fact that the AA halftrack is pretty much hard countered by UKF's t1? Or that riflemen being much stronger now along with cons makes the AA halftrack pretty moot when it comes to a suppression/damage platform. Not to mention its setup/de-setup time often gets it killed if you don't have its vet 1 ability in time. Maybe it's the change with soviet T3 as well where you can expect a quick quad/su76/t70 and an AA halftrack rush is pretty sucky against any build that rushes the soviet T3. Or that most people go captain to stuart with USF so the stun shells is all one really needs to destroy it as well. It just feels like a unit made for a different time that can't adapt to the current meta at all right now. Hence a price decrease of 5 fuel to match its current performance would do. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [OKW] [1vs1] [Mechanized HQ Flak Halftrack fuel cost]20 Oct 2015, 15:33 PM Fuel cost of the flak halftrack should be reduced now considering the M15 had a price reduction and a huge buff to its gun arc now being allowed to be fired in 360 degrees. Nothing too much, just reduce fuel cost by 5 so it costs 50 fuel to build instead of 55(far too expensive when there are better options to save fuel for). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bundle nade is really bad20 Oct 2015, 15:13 PM Just don't bother using bundle nades unless your absolutely sure they can get 2-3 models killed with them. I rather use the falls smoke phosphorous grenade than the bundle nade given any situation. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF is horribly designed20 Oct 2015, 12:12 PM The tricky part of USF is the early game MG avoidance and micro. You just can't let the OST/OKW have a proficient use of their suppression platforms. Once those are off the field, everything else just falls into place. In: COH2 Balance