Profile of Kamzil118

Avatar Area

Offline United States
Posts: 455

General Information
Register Time: 28 Mar 2015, 03:09 AM
Last Visit Time: 24 Aug 2021, 21:13 PM
Website: https://forums.spacebattles.com/members/kamzil118.322196/
Steam: 76561197988442685
Residence:

United States
Nationality:

United States
Timezone: America/Detroit
Game Name: Kamzil

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Site downtime July 26-2829 Jul 2016, 22:54 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Jul 2016, 16:48 PMCookiezNcreem "fixed it quicker than you can fix your bugs" owned +1 In: Site Feedback
Thread: Kubel24 Jul 2016, 00:41 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Jul 2016, 23:13 PMGenObi SURE!! Only if they include this for counter reasons. https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/5d/2f/4b/5d2f4b363bbc98fc9f3bb300990b52d6.jpg Maybe that could replace that jeep in mechanized company... In: Lobby
Thread: RitaRush's COH2 FanArtFridays19 Jul 2016, 01:59 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Jul 2016, 01:40 AMRitaBrush Yep! I'll start Season 2 in a week or so, but will change the format completely I guess I'll draw some group portraits this time, like on all that "me and my squad" war photocards. Anyone could provide me a photo of himself, and I'll draw one of the soldiers face based on it. 5 weeks, 5 factions group portraits, something like this. That is great to hear. I can't wait! In: The Art Studio
Thread: Jagdpanzer IV camo12 Jul 2016, 15:46 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Jul 2016, 13:01 PMvietnamabc Not enough learning I'm afraid if implemented properly camo would be a vet ability for KT. Maybe early signs from the Tactical Genius in the service of the God-Emperor. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Jagdpanzer IV camo11 Jul 2016, 21:22 PM The Jagdpanzer IV probably learned from a Tactical Genius. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Veterancy compared to other games11 Jul 2016, 20:55 PM Like Vuther said, variety itself. I would like to go into the matter of incentive as well. Engineer units would be an example. Most people don't see their engineer units to be decent at combat as frontline infantry, they are put into conflict for an incentive. In an engineer units' case, they're put into combat for the incentive of easier repairs in the late-games. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: EMS9 Jul 2016, 12:08 PM What happened? In: Scrap Yard
Thread: Maxim HMG - Unreasonably overnerfed9 Jul 2016, 02:22 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2016, 20:56 PMMissCommissar Panther is awesome for all kinds of offensive actions because of: 1. Tough armor; 2. High speed and acceleration; 3. Pretty good range of main gun + power of that. Not really, when compared to similar counterparts. The Sherman Easy Eight, Comet, and possibly the T-34/85 are better for offensive plays. The Panther has the worst accuracy on the move. It's also is terrible against infantry since the main gun doesn't have the splash damage of the Panzer IV. It fits Ostheer's defensive style, because of passive abilities like hulldown it sort of acts like a 360 anti-tank. Yes, it has blitzkrieg, but its only use is to get out of tough situations and on some ocassions hunt down damaged vehicles. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Maxim HMG - Unreasonably overnerfed8 Jul 2016, 20:41 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2016, 18:09 PMwhitesky00 I'm just quoting you because you said something hilarious to me. "While the MG42 holds a better arc, it can't cover them all since it is a single machine gun. Especially when there is three squads coming from different directions. This is where the Maxim can easily suppress units in its arc since it is focusing all of its firepower in a limited field of view." So when a player faces an mg he has to have 3 squads from different positions. Yet, when you go to the maxim you assume all 3 squads are in the area? Is this an implication that Axis players don't micro? The mg42 usually suppresses in one burst. Then, you can click on the other squad and it'll suppress that one. The maxim has to spin in a circle to do that lol. Well, I'm trying to say that if three units are caught in the arc of an mg, those in the range of the MG42 or Vickers have a better chance of leaving the arc. This is the case if those three units are not bunched together. I'm making a case where both the attacker and the defender have micro. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Maxim HMG - Unreasonably overnerfed8 Jul 2016, 17:51 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2016, 16:13 PMMissCommissar So - we either redesign Maxim for to make it defensive as all HMGs (DsHK may still be same offensive, it would add some diversity), or making for USSR defensive alternative - bunkers, new defensive stock HMG, whatever else... What we have today in USSR for to purpouses of crowd control is absolutely ineffective, it doesn't work right and doesn't do job... even bad. It must be fixed. Redesigning the Maxim? The only person who complains about it is yourself. The Maxim was doing its job correctly. Yes, it had a limited field of view, but it made up for that with easy suppression. While the MG42 holds a better arc, it can't cover them all since it is a single machine gun. Especially when there is three squads coming from different directions. This is where the Maxim can easily suppress units in its arc since it is focusing all of its firepower in a limited field of view. The Maxim has something which the Axis doesn't have, sprint. To you it may seem useless, but it will help bring presence on the battlefield. As for your mention of not being a defensive tool, I must disagree. You put the Maxim in a building and it has an arc equal to the MG42. Now you also suggest a new MG for them to use. Where the hell are you going to get that? The Maxim and the DsHK are the only two HMGs they got. Without including you in the Soviet playerbase, no one has complained about the need for bunkers. If they did, it was probably at the beginning of CoH2 release and they easily adjusted to the difference between factions. The only who complained about the subject is once again, you. In: COH2 Balance