Profile of Selvy289

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 366

General Information
Steam: 76561198119964812


Thread: Run and Gun6 Jan 2021, 08:25 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2021, 08:19 AMJulianSnow I think that the 6 PTRS rifles will get priotized in an M5 since it has 5 or 6 models shooting out of it. It caps at 4 modals, so you achieve the same in live and yes they do prioritize vehicles (you can have a double flamer ). In: Lobby
Thread: Run and Gun6 Jan 2021, 08:03 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2021, 08:01 AMJulianSnow ooh, didn't even thought of that. How is it that some squads can fire more than 2 zooks from a moving M3? Swear I had seen it somewhere. Now thinking about it, I think its the number of models instead ill check. In: Lobby
Thread: Run and Gun6 Jan 2021, 07:59 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Jan 2021, 07:56 AMJulianSnow I could see M5 with 2 penals = 6 PTRS rifles become a thing with the new patch. Vippers solution doesn't apply for this though. Don't think it's necessary to look at, but 6 PTRS M5 could become a thing yes I'm quite sure only one squad can fire out of the m5 at a time, they can't share. Would be quite terrifying through. I'll going to see through. In: Lobby
Thread: The time factor27 Dec 2020, 14:20 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Dec 2020, 13:48 PMVipper The help me in bring the thread back on truck by providing your own opinion on the matter. In you opinion making changes that help player reach their final tier faster and (back teching in necessary) will improve the game or not and why. No, best to leave it and move on. Jump back to quoted post27 Dec 2020, 13:58 PMJohnSmith What do you want to achieve with this thread at this point? Is it just nerf Soviets but packed in colourful wrappings? Comes across that way but again, Its really best to leave this thread at this point. In: Lobby
Thread: The time factor27 Dec 2020, 12:55 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Dec 2020, 12:48 PMVipper It about asking people their opinion. Ill just say this, its dosent look like your asking them their opinion. May have been the intention but it has gone out of hand. In: Lobby
Thread: The time factor27 Dec 2020, 12:41 PM Honestly vipper, is this all about mobilize reserves considering its your prime example in your opening post? I just dont know where you plan to go or what changes will be made with all this posting at this point. In: Lobby
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback23 Dec 2020, 15:41 PM I like most the changes so far, I still through think 5 man is abit strong but their is a difference. Cant say much about ostruppen as I dont see them enough in team games. I am curious if their will be any changes to grens at any given time and would like to make a wild suggestion. What about changing their native 0.91 ra to receive damage? Considering everyone complains about how fragile they are, worth a shot? Edit: or give them the conscript treatment and have 10% dr come at vet 1. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback19 Dec 2020, 16:44 PM I dont really like the penal upgrade from mobilize reserves especially of you go penal builds. You pay for quicker xp gain and reduce reforcment cost by 2. Considering mobilize reserves cost 100mp and 20 fuel you only start getting your mp worth after loosing 50 penal models. This also further makes it more fundermently flawed to unlock once you reach tier 4 because most penals may already have vetted and you have better options. Again better choice to get in tier 3. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback17 Dec 2020, 09:50 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Dec 2020, 09:41 AMVipper Well the thing is imo that giving a player choices instead of "braindead" upgrades is a good thing. The implementation of it might need fine tuning but generally allowing the player to choose where and when he want to invest is something is a good thing. Considering how impactful and important the upgrade is not really a choice. You have a issue that it comes too early, i think everyone will be getting it before tier 4. Also your going into dangerous territory about brain-dead upgrades especially about one that no one complained about. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback17 Dec 2020, 09:21 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Dec 2020, 09:10 AMKatitof I do, they allow additional timing, decision making and cost effectiveness balancing layer. The problem stems however from the fact that exclusively 1 side of the conflict has them while another freeloads on their regular tech with grand total of zero additional investments outside of obligatory healing, so you end up with 1 side having to make economical decisions and consider if they need X or can go about without it, while other side just gets everything. I get where your coming from, Ill ment I dont like global upgrades in COH2 because of the exact reasons you have mentioned. In: COH2 Balance