Profile of Selvy289

I am having some trouble reading your post mostly due to format and confused at what your point is, so I am not sure what you want to say but it seems like "I want to prove you wrong post".

Dam thats rich. Look in a nut shell, befor I said bars are better spent on rifle men and then you filled me out on how they benefit pathfinders more. Then you said they have better synergy with rifles equiped with bars. Thats all.

For the record I am suspecting JLIR is over-watch may be problematic due to their very low target combined an commander ability that further boost their received accuracy, I simply have not tested enough to have an educed opinion. I have made suggestion on how they should be deployed

On the other hand moving a infantry like the pathfinders with elite weapon like paratroopers carbine in CP 0 and weapon that can critical kill without at starting on CD is another story, with it own problems. If pathfinders get spammed they can be cancerous especially at vet 3 with their extended range.

I can see how 0cp pathfinders can be a problem but please bare in mind they cost 290mp (30mp reinforce) and have no abilities and are 4man squads(besides signal relay that is only good if you have paratroopers). Yes they have better sight and range but thats mainly it.

Up most pay small amount of muni for the scoped garands.

You need double Bars to make pathfinders worth a 290mp unit most of the time. So the entire doctrine abilities require a muni sink to preform.

I have been playing around with pathfinders and I'll say don't.

Double equipping pathfinders do not transfer the bar to another squad member, if a member who has a scoped Garand dies, their weapon will also not transfer.

IR pathfinder are better in my opinion because they are cheaper, have artillary barrage (which is very decent) have one member that can transfer weapons after double bar upgarde and have one scoped garand to sniper infantry.

Like all the new changes! Good resolution with the concrete bunkers.

The only gripe I have is that I feel the gap in cost/performance is widening between pathfinders and JLI (path finders being JLI closes resemblance).

We are already getting a revamped rifle company, Its just been renamed mechanized company.

Iv been testing the valentine in a vacuum against the AEC and puma, both still beat the valentine in a 1v1 (vet 0 and vet 3, I know it has better amour that could bounce shots but in this case it's rare to non-existent) and has bearly better ai performance than them. Point is, if your after a offensive (and in this case better) vehical early, the AEC is blatently a better option.

I know its strength is utility but hell, with how late it comes out good luck trying to vet it up. I feel like with the sexton ability, it should layby have a stealth ability to close the gap so the arty ability could be performed (maybe instead of the recon ability?) just a suggestion.

Only brushing over the other commanders so far, the only thing I feel right now is with the 5 man gren squad should only be able to pick up 1 weapon like conscripts when they upgrade with the ppsh. I feel like Pioneers costing only 30 muni as well for a 5th man may spell trouble (mayby also consider limiting weapons to one).

One final note, the sturmtiger I feel defiantly needs its suppression to stay longer (whats it now ? less than 3 seconds?).