Profile of niutudis

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 276

General Information
Steam: 76561198002636648


Thread: Forwarded base and OKW trucks territory mechanism8 Apr 2015, 11:26 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Apr 2015, 10:58 AMEsxile Actually OKW can place an early med truck offensively without being punished before Sov build a Zis or USF spend fuel in a Half-track or captain. And here again the truck last enough long for you to counter attack. But the concept of being that much offensive with no fear of downside is what I don't really understand with FHQ working on neutral territories. No fear of a downside? Realy? Ever played okw? If you decide to place the fhq offensively there is a risk that it gets blownup before it is fully unpacked, just by small-arms-fire. If it is fully unpacked it can be bombarded by mortars, you have to spend another 300 manpower to turn it into a forward retreatpoint, this also takes some time. If you have your forward retreat set up, there is always the risk that you retreat your troops and they are killed by enemy mg/mortar/flamer/whatever. Jump back to quoted post8 Apr 2015, 10:58 AMEsxile But yes maybe it would be too much. It wasn't in Coh, I have hard time believing it would be in Coh2. In coh1 those trucks had also additional functions... and the brits where defensive . In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: What maps do you miss from CoH18 Apr 2015, 10:49 AM Sturzdorf, Wolfheze, Redball Express, Steel Pact. All much better then the new maps we got with the latest patch. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Forwarded base and OKW trucks territory mechanism8 Apr 2015, 10:40 AM Depending on the map it would be a like a nerf. It would discourage okw-players from placing the healing-truck in an offensive position (this would nullify the effect of this change) and it could make it impossible to hold ground against us-rifleblobs, or allied earlygame-advantage... It would also force the okw-player to produce more and more volks to cap the territory back, because then he would not be able to produce indirect-fire or the tankdestroyer to effectively fight enemy armor or infantry. I realy don´t know why this kind of mechanic would be any good, because those trucks are mostly a big stationary target and both, us and sowiets, have more then enough tools to take them down quickly + if you are able to cut his fhq off, he is already in a bad position anyway and further gimping okw would only add to the earlygame-advantage of the allies. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: 6 consecutive losses against arranged teams6 Apr 2015, 11:09 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Apr 2015, 13:29 PMInverse I have the fact that Valve, in spite of their massive player base, actively worked to prevent segmentation of their matchmaking queues in much the same way that Relic is doing right now. That suggests very strongly that they feel shorter queue times are more important than more balanced matches, since their actions explicitly sacrificed balanced matches for less waiting. That right there is evidence that the developers of one of the largest multiplayer games around believe shorter queue times are most important when it comes to maintaining the health of the game. Hmmm... According to this it would be the best idea to get rid of any kind of elobased or whatever matchmaking because then we could have the lowest waitingtimes... "Every match is totaly unbalanced, but damn I love the short waitingtime in the matchmaking." Just match available players to maximize the enjoyment! I do like short wait-times, but I love balanced matches. Good to know I am a weirdo. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: "You have been disconnected"5 Apr 2015, 12:18 PM I get this message randomly every once in a while, but when I get it everything else still works. I guess it has something to do with relics servers, but it´s too random and it happens not often enough to be sure... In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Intentional lagging players??5 Apr 2015, 11:40 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Apr 2015, 08:01 AMMajorBloodnok COH2.ORG decided upon launch that we will not take on any anti-cheating responsibilities. Those should be directed to Relic. Relic wants it that way too. Then please close this thread. It was just looking like it was intentional, of course this could have been just some kind of coincidence. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: 6 consecutive losses against arranged teams5 Apr 2015, 11:36 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Apr 2015, 00:31 AMInverse What evidence do you have that it's turning off new players more than unreasonably long wait times would? The fact that games far larger than CoH2 go to similar measures to reduce queue times suggests that the industry as a whole believes shorter wait times are more important than more balanced matches. What evidence do you have to contradict that? What evidence do you have? Other then guessing and assumption... I don´t think any company will give their statistic data about pvp-population in relation to matchmaking and wait-times, maybe you have more luck with that... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Terminator snipers4 Apr 2015, 23:09 PM Nice. There is that nostalgic coh1-flair around... In: Replays
Thread: 6 consecutive losses against arranged teams4 Apr 2015, 22:45 PM Strange how hard people defend the current system that is turning off new players by saying the playerbase is too small... Realy bizarre. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Relic, let the community balance the game4 Apr 2015, 22:36 PM Looking at how onesided the most players are as they call themselfs allied or axis -players .... No just, N O In: COH2 Balance