Profile of AssaultPlazma

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 300

General Information
Steam: 76561198025875429
Birthday: 1996-05-24


Thread: MGs are not supposed to kill?29 Mar 2015, 14:15 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2015, 10:34 AMdpfarce Jump Assault Marines into Shuriken Banshees say Hello bonus dmg vs Power Armour Bonus melee damage vs retreating squads Lose EXPENSIVE models on retreat (from a 3 man squad!) Run Rifles into MG42 Throw Grenade Retreat Lose 0 or 1 (or even 2, if you want to argue) model(s) from a 5 man squad because suppression reduces damage dealt Jumping a squad into melee range is significantly more risky than throwing a grenade from 300km away with grenade bulletins. "But derpface you have banshee + Shuriken vs Assault Marines, but only rifles vs. MG42!!" Assault Marines = 500 req 50 power Banshee = 400 req Shuriken = 240 req 30 power Total = 500 req/50 power vs 640 req/30 power. Not identical, but somewhat similar. 20 power for 140 req isn't an unreasonable difference. Rifleman = 280 MP MG42 = 240MP so in your DOW II scenario you bring an extra unit into the equation but fail to do so with the COH 2 Scenario? How is that fair? if if your adding banshees to the mix then you have to add a gren squad or perhaps pioneers upgraded to the mix.... In: Lobby
Thread: USF wishes for patch28 Mar 2015, 20:27 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2015, 18:08 PMThe Silver Sage If you want an in game example, look how luchs survives against AT guns in comparison with T70 and stuart. That extra shot really does make a difference to survivability, you have more time to react and/or escape. True you make a point. however lets not discount the fact the jackson has 60 range and is mobile unlike an AT gun. As far as I can see with these changes just moving back slighty is all slugger would have to do too remain on top. Perhaps we could have Faustcostbulletin or another modding user test the changes to see the impact? In: Lobby
Thread: USF wishes for patch28 Mar 2015, 17:51 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2015, 17:48 PMVuther Well, 5.2 more seconds to live is 5.2 more seconds, an M36 definitely doesn't instantly kill all of Wehrmacht T3 the moment they show their faces right now...be a bit more feasible to outplay them in a shot-blocker sort of map with a PIV since then an M36 won't have a chance as long as the PIV gets in without being shot up first. Would also help stop a single PIV from being pretty much definitely dead the moment two M36s get made and placed in range. Think I'd still prefer M36 at 160 damage instead of 200 because it'll still two-shot StuG Gs with the latter. Again I fail how this drastically change things. So I need an extra hit with gurenteed pen vs all of OST Tier 3? if anything they'll they're being hit a Jackson and have to retreat anyway cause if they try to bomb rush they'll still die..... In: Lobby
Thread: USF wishes for patch28 Mar 2015, 17:44 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2015, 17:29 PMRemi USF are the strongest faction in 1vs1 and have been since WFA release, take a look at the leaderboards all those ridiculous winning streaks/percentages compared to other factions don't lie. They have the best Infantry, large squad sizes, cheap teaching that gives you free units and a forward reinforce point, the best/earliest light vehicles, Mines and Medium armour in the game. Hell the only thing they lack is a heavy tank, but that doesn't matter when you have P-47's and a TD that can two shot StuG's. -Best Infantry Early game, but scales badly lategame(better than conscripts though) unless double upgraded with LMGs which is 120-140 munition a squad -M20 is great Ill give you that AAHT is no better than OKW version if anything worse since its timing ensures it has a limited window to do anything, and is probably worse since it lacks smoke -M20 mines are awesome but that also the greatest weakness since it gated behind a vehicle that you may or may not have and may not always be viable to deploy lategame especially since its useless besides laying mines at that point. -agreed US medium armor is good other than the jackson currently being too good vs Ostheer T3 and too lackluster against lategame armor while also being USF sole lategame AT option against lategame besides P47s -Lacking a Heavy Tank means alot especially in team games, P47s are good but they dont fully substitute heavy tanks, and I fail too see what 2 shotting StuGs has too do with latgame since no one uses them lategame? In: Lobby
Thread: USF wishes for patch28 Mar 2015, 17:31 PM I fail to see how making the Jackson requiring one extra shot to destroy axis T3 Tanks will fix the problem? In: Lobby
Thread: Pershing in demand27 Mar 2015, 14:43 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Mar 2015, 14:42 PMSwonVIP Youre right. But Soviet/USF needs a little bit more of communication and organisation between two players... so then I guess SU-85 behind a IS-2 is unbeatable or a Panther Behind A Tiger I/II? In: Lobby
Thread: Real Talk: Panther26 Mar 2015, 19:30 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Mar 2015, 18:46 PMAlexzandvar Not really, Allied late game is fine, but it's much harder for the average player to pull off if you have a USF heavy team without P47's. The secret as has been discussed before, is getting rid of veteran ability's that are just lazly slapped on every unit and replacing them with abilities that help fill the weakness's of the tank it's tied to. And the fastest heavy tank in the game is the KV1, followed by the IS2. The KT is the slowest tank in the game. Im almost certain in other threads you have said allied lategame is not "Fine" and abilities that fill weakness's of a vehicles? Uh we already that its called Blitz and we see how thats working..... In: Lobby
Thread: Pershing in demand26 Mar 2015, 15:59 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Mar 2015, 15:41 PMAlexzandvar If your going to add the Pershing don't put it in a commander. Make it so you need to unlock all the American tiers first. The KT is like how every heavy should be, tied to having all your teching done first to encourage people to actually play the game with their core units instead of pissing around waiting for a call in to win the game. The only real exception to this would be Soviets, who should only have to get either T1 or T2 and T3 or T4. last thing we need is more stock heavies the stock USF lategame tank should be the M4A3E8 as should the T-34/85 be fore the USSR KT needs to become doctrinal and switch the JadgTiger(move it to a new doctrine) OKW stock lategame tank would be the Panther II if I had my way with(yes I know it never went past the prototype phase and yes I know that would require reworking OKW as a whole) In: Lobby
Thread: Pershing in demand26 Mar 2015, 15:25 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Mar 2015, 15:22 PMAustralian Magic Pershing was used between 1945-1953 so we might say that it served few months as heavy and years as medium. yes that exactly what happened after WWII the bar for armor and firepower was raised, as far as the pershing was concerned it was no longer a Heavy based on these measurements so it was appropriately re classed as a medium tank. But COH 2 Takes place on WWII and in that conflict the Pershing stats wise a straight equal to the Tiger I and no one will deny that was a heavy tank. In: Lobby
Thread: Pershing in demand26 Mar 2015, 15:19 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Mar 2015, 15:18 PMAustralian Magic Since the middle of 46' it was reclass to medium Uh yeah...... like After WWII...... edit: And that was simply because of rapidly changing world of tanks in which the overall bar for armor and armament was going up so the pershing's no longer really fit into heavy tank In: Lobby