Profile of AssaultPlazma

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 300

General Information
Steam: 76561198025875429
Birthday: 1996-05-24


Thread: Five man grenadier squads are exactly what Ostheer need.19 Mar 2015, 00:51 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Mar 2015, 23:47 PMOmega_Warrior I'm not saying it's not powerful against ostheer, just that it is still a T3 level unit in terms of unit value. While it is obviously better at things then the other TDs, debatably more important things, it isn't a T4 unit in terms of value. As in it isn't on the same level of power as panthers, brumbars, or KT. For example, T34-85 and sherman 76 are actually better then their T3 counterparts. On the other hand a Jackson will will actually lose in a head-on fight against a jagdpanzer or su-85, other T3 level units. Ostheer's weakness to it has much more to do with not having a proper TD themselves to fight it. I know can be hard to kill good player's jacksons with infantry AT. Fair enough maybe your right. perhaps if the stug III gets reworked into a TD with 60 range OST T3 might become more viable against USF. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Schwerer so broken, will it be fixed in the upcoming patch?19 Mar 2015, 00:42 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Mar 2015, 00:25 AMAlexzandvar The thing is you can move your ambulence, and it doesn't make units and it doesn't cost 40 fuel. The disadvantage of the BG HQ is that it tells your enemy exactly were you will be once you retreat, and it allows you to zero in on him with indirect fire. You can move your forward retreat point around as USF, once you put that truck down as OKW that's it for you. What indirect fire? Pack Howitzer?, Mortar Halftrack?, Greyhound?(both doctrinal) also what makes you think you'll always have indirect setup and ready to fire once he retreats? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: COH2 sold 4 million units in 201419 Mar 2015, 00:21 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Mar 2015, 21:18 PMsir muffin remember those angry russians because they didn't like how relic was portraying them as murdering savages? Some of it was true, however the plot really did overemphasize it. Lets face it no one bought a game like this for this for political drama/war crimes In: Lobby
Thread: Five man grenadier squads are exactly what Ostheer need.18 Mar 2015, 23:21 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Mar 2015, 23:09 PMAlexzandvar Not every faction should be the same, honestly Soviets and Ostheer need to be brought up to par with OKW and USF teching, USF and OKW don't need to get nerfed down to Vanilla levels. The issue here is Soviets by design use call in meta, so they aren't nearly as effected by the insane teching costs as Ostheer is. Not to mention the fact Soviets tech is non-linear allowing them to skip paying for things. Ostheer needs a fix in it's teching, Soviets just need to have their stock units buffed and then everyone is happy. I wouldn't mind extra bonus's being added to Vanilla tier buildings. Say for instance T1 as Ost gave you a extra pioneer squad, and T2 gave you a free Officer. Soviet's being the same way, T1 gives you a engineer squad and T2 gives you a free Officer. I never exactly meant every faction has to be a 100% mirror, but teching IMO needs less asymmetry(as in OBK and USF can keep the trucks and officers they would just have an extra officer or truck structure) how can realistically buff the soviets last 2 structures to be a match for OST or OBK late game when they're sidegrades instead of one being a straight increase of power? How can we realistically buff USF late game to compete with axis when they have no other tech beyond Major which is very much T3 plus the jackson which is basically a T4 unit in T3 and we all know the problems that is causing with OST T3. On that subject I fail to see how a penetration buff coupled with a dmg decrease will make the jackson any less dominate against OST T3 while I guess it would make it more viable against heavies though...... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Five man grenadier squads are exactly what Ostheer need.18 Mar 2015, 23:01 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Mar 2015, 22:31 PMdaspoulos Well said OKW/USF do have an easier time affording large groups of infantry compared to the base factions. These are tech up based problems. so am I the only guy who feels at the very all faction should operate under the basic tech structure of an HQ with 4 more buildings the first 2 being sidegrades with 3 and 4 giving a clear and measurable power creep? I always found it strange how WFA faction only have HQ+3 compared to vanilla HQ+4 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscripts scaling to late game...17 Mar 2015, 23:37 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Mar 2015, 23:28 PMKatitof Did they merged you to death? Katitof I figured he wouldn't be able to get you of all people..... In: Lobby
Thread: OKW Redesign17 Mar 2015, 01:00 AM Remind me again what were yelling about? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Five man grenadier squads are exactly what Ostheer need.15 Mar 2015, 06:45 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2015, 11:18 AMpussyking Yeah, abrams diesel engine which rotates the turret burns like hell and thats exactly why it will get overheated if thrown by a molotov you realize the engine on an abrams isnt directly exposed? Even then all newer models have slat armor protecting the engine block anyway..... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 100mm BS-3 AT Gun13 Mar 2015, 06:49 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2015, 06:46 AMElSlayer Snipers4theWin? isnt that already the case with sniper spam? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: 100mm BS-3 AT Gun13 Mar 2015, 05:39 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2015, 05:14 AMbraciszek The blobs must live on MVGame at least if done right the blobs would have a clear weakness being having the SS officers picked off rending the volksturn practically useless! In: COH2 Gameplay