Profile of BasedSecretary

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1197

General Information


Thread: since we are adding prototype tanks in game12 Oct 2022, 14:37 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2022, 13:58 PMWilly Pete U mean u don't have a response. Screaming and crying about alliedcucks didn't work so ur out of options lmao Solid work "professor" I cannot respond to the same retarded arguments with the same disarming logic that I possess for the 34th time in this thread. Sorry. In: Lobby
Thread: since we are adding prototype tanks in game12 Oct 2022, 13:10 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2022, 12:24 PMWilly Pete American riflemen in stalingrad? That's historical? British comets in Moscow? Ussr T34s in Eindhoven? This has nothing to with my point, but feel free to keep crying about it if it makes u feel better. Cuz its definitely making me laugh Jump back to quoted post12 Oct 2022, 12:12 PMWilly Pete We already went over this "professor" I play both sides. I doubt the same can be said for u seeing as ur having a mental crisis because of the BP I guess ull stop playing the game and we won't have to hear from u anymore? Oh no, what a nightmare U mean like the British defending moscow? U mean like usf defending stalingrad? Have u ever played coh2 u fucking nitwit? Lmao ur pathetic hypocrisy is so entertaining. And i don't think u even know what ur arguing against Im not ur therapist, go cry to someone else 150% retard mode activated. Aborting conversation with you. In: Lobby
Thread: [Relic][Roadmap] #5 2022 Fall Content12 Oct 2022, 11:41 AM Maybe a multiplayer beta? Why not? In: COH3 Central
Thread: since we are adding prototype tanks in game12 Oct 2022, 11:39 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2022, 17:57 PMWilly Pete The person I was responding to said Relic's history doesn't matter at all. I think that is a much stranger statement than me pointing out that coh3 is a sequel and that precedence matters. Doesn't mean coh3 needs to be exactly the same, but the first 2 games patterns are definitely not irrelevant... I'm not rly sure y u r still talking to me tbh. U have made ur opinion clear, and u have already conceded that coh2 has more failures of authenticity then coh3. U also conceded that u still plan on buying the game. My entire debate started over someone saying they wouldn't be buying coh3 cuz of BP. Which they are entitled to do, but i find that silly All im saying is the lvl of surprise over BP confuses me. That's it facepalm I said the exact opposite. You can argue all day and all night whether the representation of KT/JT etc. on the vacuum of a COMPANY level military engagement is fair and ""realistic"" but you can never argue the historicity of the units taking part. This is a new age of retardedness where people can and will argue about whether BP fighting capability is fairly represented in the game since IT NEVER FOUGHT. IT'S A PAPER TANK FFS IT HAS 0 COMBAT HISTORY. 0! In: Lobby
Thread: since we are adding prototype tanks in game12 Oct 2022, 11:37 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Oct 2022, 17:59 PMWilly Pete Lol im glad u finally learned how to read. At least u graduated from assuming everyone arguing against u is just obsessed with allied dominance Because its relevant to my point. Just cuz its not relevant to ur incessant whining doesn't mean shit This is CoH 3. Not a brand new franchise that's attempting to market itself as 100% realistic. It's a continuation of the first 2 games U mean its part of ur problem. I guess cope is just a word u scream at everyone else except urself I have no problem with KT being included in coh2. If u think i do, then clearly u r still struggling with reading No it's not. Simple as that. And your answer shows this. You just want to stick it to "kek ma WehRaBoOsS". Any person with 0.5braincell would be against BP because it sets a very terrible precedent. Ok maybe if you stretch retardedness far enough you could get away with the addition of a special unit type BP. What will happen when, in a year's time or two, lelic will want to to add as a dlc more obsolete vehicles? Or if they wanted to make it a historical fiction shit? Like putting Japanese faction fighting in NA alongside DAK and Wehr? Think, please. Think big scale before you start pounding for KT or ST or JT or whatever other shits and giggles alliedcucks obsess themselves over. In: Lobby
Thread: CD Projekt Red Is dead10 Oct 2022, 12:32 PM A true fucking shame. But it's too early alright. The aggressors always have the upperhand in the first days of war. Soon all this will be fought with multiple times more force and people. Nobody wants these, and nobody will fight FOR these ideals. The only people that benefit from woke culture are very few "intellectuals" and some braindead larpers. In: Other Games
Thread: since we are adding prototype tanks in game10 Oct 2022, 12:29 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Oct 2022, 17:47 PMKatukov this is the best take on the subject there is also no need for the black prince because the churchill 7 is more than enough, everything short of a 88mm pak/flak will have a hell of a time to play vs it True In: Lobby
Thread: since we are adding prototype tanks in game10 Oct 2022, 12:28 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Oct 2022, 12:08 PMWilly Pete Its rly not that strange, but ur welcome to ur opinion. Imo its very simple. I dont want superheavies in general, but mostly just for gameplay reasons I just find the argument that "BP isnt historical" to be funny because the previous games werent all that authentic either. Thats it Of course ur welcome to complain about its addition. I just dont understand the lvl of surprise some ppl r having The problem with people like you is that you are neither for nor against BP. All you talk about is how lelic in the past abused history. That's a whole other story. You saying "I am not against nor for BP but lelic with KT [insert random ranting completely missing the point]" is part of the problem. In: Lobby
Thread: since we are adding prototype tanks in game10 Oct 2022, 12:26 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Oct 2022, 17:36 PMMr Carmine Ratte was an unrealistic and unpractical design thought up by people who missed the mark. That it would actually be usefful is fiction at its best. The bp however though not deployed was a realistic and viable design. Based or previous designs that saw action, That's your take and yours only. There's no point comparing effectiveness of units that never saw battle, that's the whole point of this thread. You saying that in a battlefield scenario BP would perform "better" than Maus is larping at least and alliedcucking at most. In: Lobby
Thread: since we are adding prototype tanks in game7 Oct 2022, 16:43 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Oct 2022, 16:14 PMMr Carmine I stated the st's record is almost none excistant and is very close to being a prototype on its own to where the bp is in history. Hence undeserving of being in coh (esp stock) You also just confirmed here that everything known is rare scetchy and up for debate about the st. That it never got the chance to prove itself in its role is a failure on its own. Sketchy, agreed. Nonexistant, no. "Close to being a prototype" is a critique only you make and most historians disagree with. In: Lobby