Hi is talking about the vet 1 ability that stuka has that does fire damage to emplacements. Getting a stuka to vet 1 is another story.
I know what he means, but it doesn't work. This can be checked in cheat mode or with bots, low damage, the British just need to press one button and that's it, nothing complicated. By the way, the timing of Bofors is 5-7 minutes, remind the timing of Stuka, which is ineffective against Bofors. As for me, there is nothing better than anti-tank guns |
In case you don't know, stuka half-track can fire incendiary rockets which is just as efficient and comes w/o doctrine.
Please learn to use the ability when brace is on CD. That's the least of control you can do.
you are either a liar because the Stuka is not at all effective against a bofors, or you are an idiot because you do not know how to use the brace structure and your engineers. Maybe you didn't know, but they can repair Bofors! |
Bofor is OP ?. Right, until you know how to deal with it.
For example, Player C3 Tooth had spend thousands of match in COH2 but still dont know how to counter sim city properly.
Until me tell him to use flame barrage from ISG.
OKW has flame barrage in the only one doctrine - feuersturm. It’s not smart, cuz Brit’s has a “brace structure” and this ability really helps. Bofors is OP not because it is impossible for destroying, but OP cuz it’s cheap and give a lot of impact for this cost. You, as AXIS player, should waste a lot of timeto destroy Bofors, which is incomparable with its costs and speed of construction. |
|
Hi all! I’ve a question about dps of sturm officer. The well known calculator shows dps with a p-08, but there is no data about damage with mp44, when this unit get it. Can anyone tell me something about that? |
My only issue playing with them is unless there is green cover nearby they're going to lose to Grens in early firefights until you can get that sweet 5-man upgrade or some Brens. Since they aren't like riflemen i'm forced to rely on sappers for things like MG flanks. They're a solid infantry unit once they have those nice upgrades, but early game they're supremely limited. Especially since they are the only inf that don't have any kind of AT snare.
Тhe British can make sandbags for themselves, and the Wehrmacht grenadiers cannot, given that the Germans do not have such crazy bonuses when shooting from cover... In this case, it would be logical to remove the ability to make sandbags from Tommy, let the engineers do it. |
You're giving numbers provided from an author (whom I was referring to) who considered the MG34 to be somewhat mediocre himself.
On top of that, the site is a bit outdated anyways. The description for the Maxim states that Sustained Fire is unlocked on vet 1. Even if this is updated, it shows the author lacks attention to detail.
Well, the opinion of the author, everything is wrong, the mg-34 is the best machine gun in the game, what is it better than the rest, what is its advantage? |
I'm just waiting for the alliedcucks to come here and pour over this little guy
Give me at least one advantage of the MG-34, only the shelling arch is not taken into account, since the MG-42 and Vickers have the same arch, while the MG-34 is installed and folded at the same speed as the Vickers and MG-42. MG-34 is a Chinese copy of MG-42 only worse in every way. Give the OKW the same machine gun as the Americans, since it is so "bad" ... |
This is the problem imo. You need to invest so much just to get them to a state close to Grens with LMGs or Volks. You need bolster, you need to tech grenades and weapon racks. And the Wehr player? Well, he has to press lmb once and invest 60 ammo and is just as competitive as you with your enormous investment. Additionally, he gets rifle nades for free and has a Pfaust, which Tommies don't have at all.
Because anti-tank grenades are not needed by Tommy, the British sappers have them! British engineers are not at war with useless firecrackers like the German ones.
Yeah, yes, of course, but the technology of the British gives them not only these amenities. I am silent about the cost of the Bofors, which is cheaper than SDKFZ with Flak-38. |
Because of their high base stats the get lower vet bonus values.
What does get lower mean? Lower than what? I provided evasion rates, they are better than their counterparts. It would be strange if Tommy's bonuses were even better. |
Problem with UKF is they're the only faction starting with a mainline for free. When Relic decided to put Royal Engineers in T1, they should just have swapped them wit RE. Therefore Brits would start with a pioneer squad just like all other factions do. But they missed the chance to balance this. So we have Tommy blobs for many years now...
But Tommies themselves are not OP. As Ost, you have PGrens, as OKW Obers. Just build them and you shred Tommies.
I think it is incorrect to compare the German elite infantry with Tommy, Tommy should be compared with Volks and Grenadiers. I can also compare Vokls with commandos or with Soviet shockers.
I didn't say that I don't know how to play against the British, I say that the German starting infantry is weaker than the Allied starting infantry. |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
