Profile of TheSleep3r

Jump back to quoted post5 Apr 2015, 14:10 PMBergstrand

Are you suggesting that Germany isnt the good guy? Wut

Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2015, 15:06 PMAlexzandvar

The nerf to tracking basically made it a giant waste of munitions.

Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2015, 15:06 PMAlexzandvar

And the issue is that there is exactly 2 useful Assault Gun's in the game, the StuG III Ausf E, and the Sturmtiger.

Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2015, 15:06 PMAlexzandvar

The StuG III Ausf G and Su-76 both preform anemic in their anti tank and anti infantry rolls and both need to be given some sort of specialization or advantage rather than both just being shit at everything.

Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2015, 15:06 PMAlexzandvar

~sometimes~ would at least make it useful as a multi roll vehicle and artillery piece,

Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2015, 15:06 PMAlexzandvar

and considering Soviets have enough squad wipe shenanigans as it is I thought improving the SU-76's performance against armor was more useful.

• Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2015, 02:59 AMAlexzandvar

  
  The SU-76 and 85 now have a ambush ability, they hull down themselves and when an enemy enters the tanks firing range will deliver a stun crit and a guaranteed penetration. When this hull down cloak is active the tank cannot move forward or backwards, and can only rotate slowly (Thanks for this idea Elch )
  

  
  
  SU-76 is not a tank destroyer. Its role is move with infantry and help them in destroying bunkers and such, as it is written right in the unit description.

Jump back to quoted post21 Mar 2015, 01:33 AMBrick Top

From a design standpoint, Soviet indirect fire is meant for battering fortified german positions and armour. Werh indirect fire is meant for countering the soviet stuff. (Hence why it tends to have less damage, more accuracy and counter barrage abilities accross the board).