Profile of Zansibar

Avatar Area

Offline Sweden
Posts: 158 | Subs: 2

General Information
Last Visit Time: 14 Jul 2021, 21:24 PM
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCVPSS9k6ASbrDZcoSIhKT0g
Steam: 76561198020781963
Residence:

Sweden
Nationality:

Sweden
Game Name: Zansibar

Show Latest Posts


Thread: What is the weakness from Jackson?14 Jan 2018, 15:27 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Jan 2018, 09:45 AMjagd wölfe LUL the disinformation here XD I would pull out 222 20mm and ostwind 37mm penetration as well as dps versus jackson and jadgpanzer 4 rof (that isn't 20% faster)...but it's not like i'm expecting a non biased answer. This is exactly why nobody on this forum takes you seriously. All you do is scream bias. You do not disprove anyone, you do not provide any good counter arguments. And you call anyone who opposes anything that isnt in axis favor biased. Literally feminist behavior. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What is the weakness from Jackson?14 Jan 2018, 15:08 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Jan 2018, 00:32 AMinsaneHoshi Please look at the patch notes again, jp4s vet was changed. Also what are you on? The Jackson vulnerable to a 222? Get outta here Besides the single rear armor hit from the 222 you can clearly see that they pen the jackson quite regularly from the front. Which indeed makes it vulnerable to light cannons, even from the front. (This does ofcourse not mean that a 222 is a counter to it, it just proves how poor its armor is. And thats its biggest weakness.) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What is the weakness from Jackson?14 Jan 2018, 14:56 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jan 2018, 22:58 PMStug life all the vet nerf ? (it has fixed turret and is worse than su 85) Oh yes they gave it 20% more accuracy instead of the armor increase by vet, which i highly doubt is any reason for it being any worse at all. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What is the weakness from Jackson?13 Jan 2018, 22:47 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jan 2018, 22:12 PMullumulu it cost 5fuel more than a jagdpz4..which is shit since patch The JPIV wasnt even changed besides its camo ability. Its just as good as the jackson. The weakness of the jackson is its non existent armor, an ostwind can fight it pretty well. Meanwhile the JP IV and most other expensive TDs have some armor. JPIV has 230 armor The Jackson has 130. This also means that the jackson is vaulnerable to mortar rounds more so than any other tank, as well as light cannons (222 20mm, AAA cannons in general.) (Also the JP IV fires about 20% faster.) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Helping Hans deleted Coh2 cause of allie biased patch13 Jan 2018, 22:42 PM I like how he calls the sniper/guards combo op and that that game is balanced because of it when they werent even changed In: Scrap Yard
Thread: How do I pak howitzer? 20 Dec 2017, 11:17 AM ~~Its auto fire range is quite poor tho, afaik~~ nvm they are the same Still find it a bit silly that the Leig is so stupidly cheap for a light howitzer, while the us one is 380 In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: How do I pak howitzer? 20 Dec 2017, 00:06 AM Dont worry, someone told me its better than the leig because it has 2 extra crewmembers. Sarcasm aside, it really is intended to be a long range support weapon for slowly killing emplacements, mgs, etc. Its also decent for harassing far out okw bases. Build one, get it to vet 1 and spam white phos for area denial. It pretty much is a cheap icendiary canon at that point. In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: pre-DBP axis get owned but press autowin button19 Dec 2017, 21:26 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Dec 2017, 21:16 PMSturmpanther A) In front of your Ele/ Jt should be always inf with snare so no matter... B) If you still don't like it go --> stug and jagdpIV But yeah sorry that you can't 2shot a su85 anymore on maxrange, because he made 1 single mistake on maxrange. thanks for being a sensible human being im not even being ironic In: Replays
Thread: December Balance Preview7 Dec 2017, 13:09 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Dec 2017, 12:54 PMKurfürst It simply builds on the fact that the roaming horde can simply out DPS and f*ck up things faster than the opponent can even react. This applies to E8/LL Sherman and to a lesser extent, StuG / SU76 spam as the latter at least have to face their targets and cannot just do drive-by shootings. You are talking about things that never happen, i dont think a Vet 3 E8/LL Sherman blob has ever existed, and thus they cant just "out dps" everything as a horde because such hordes dont exist. And even if it would happen the enemy places a single panther infront of them and the LL Shermans bounce like crazy because the Panther hard counters them. In: Lobby
Thread: December Balance Preview7 Dec 2017, 13:02 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Dec 2017, 12:54 PMKurfürst [code][/code]~ 2 secs reloads are absurd on any tank. Even the StuG doesn't get such with veterancy, and that's an AT only gun, not a dual purpose one as on the LL/E8 Sherman. Having it for roughly the same fuel price as the Pz IV is what makes it even more absurd, but hey, I guess its only Axis tanks that could over perform for their cost. Turbo firing tank guns are just bad for gameplay in general since its a massive incentive to just hoard some tanks and roam the map with them Starcraft style with next to nade tactical play involved. And the Ost P4 gets 30% additional armor at Vet 2 which the Sherman doesnt, you should see how much the new M4A3 76 bounces even on a vet 0 P4. Sherman gets just more ROF, P4 gets more ROF and Armor judging only by combat relevant parameters. Still dont see your problems. Dont agree that fast firing guns are bad for gameplay if the gun in question is higly medicore by itself. If it would tear through armor like a Panther it would be a problem, but it doesnt. If it would tear through infantry like a T-34 85 or a tiger it would be a problem, but it doesnt. If its meh at everything (which it is), i dont see it as a problem. In: Lobby