Profile of Butcher

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1218

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/butcher_ger


Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/04/20155 Sep 2015, 12:37 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2015, 12:25 PMBurts I honestly doubt that the buff will stick, because the buff was completely unwarranted in the first place. Unwarranted like the Panzerwerfer-nerf after the panzerwerfer-nerf? Or the (I hope accidental) ninja Panzerwerfer-nerf in the last patch? The unit that is stuck like that for over a year now? Relic is going to do whatever the fuck they want. And a mild Tiger buff isn´t going to break the game. Keep in mind it also has been constantly nerfed (HP decrease, Blitz nerf, no armor buff on vet, call in limitation to 1). It was lacking as a heavy tank, thus needed adjustment. And instead of mirroring an IS-2, it gets range. In: Lobby
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/04/20155 Sep 2015, 12:06 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2015, 11:57 AMFlying Dustbin Partisans have already been adjusted. They have STG-44s and Panzerschrecks by default and are really good now. (Also irregulars have been replaced by the AT partisans) While they definitely needed a buff, giving them top of the notch German equipment that even the Germans didn´t have in overwhelming quantities seems a bit silly. I think they would have been better off with the (buffed) Ppsh or even Sten guns. Why they didn´t get camouflage is beyond me. Isn´t that THE unit to attack form an ambush? In: Lobby
Thread: Native Language Option5 Sep 2015, 10:34 AM As a German I have to say I´m all for that option. The German voices for the British are terrible. You can´t fake a Scottish accent in German. "Naughty boys" (or whatever the announcer says in the English version) sounds incredibly stupid in German (ungezogene Bengel). It makes you cringe. In: Lobby
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/04/20155 Sep 2015, 09:00 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2015, 08:55 AMBurts Ah yes, tiger having more penetration than IS-2 and more range than king tiger so realistic, much wow. All heavies should have the same range. Don´t act dumb here. That´s a problem of those units. The Tiger as a whole was a liability since it was limited to one unit at a time. It´s no secret it went down way faster than an IS-2. The range increase changes how the unit is going to be used. And that way of usage that´s encouraged is infact realistic and a new strategy. I like some asymmetric balance for the heavies. Tigers could have the range advantage, the IS-2 could have a lower cost and higher damage, Pershing could be something in between. In: Lobby
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/04/20155 Sep 2015, 08:47 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2015, 07:37 AMOmega_Warrior The two guys below you for starters. If the intention was to make it better vs the IS-2 the penetration would have been just fine. The range buff made it better vs everything else which is completely unnecessary. I disagree. The Tiger buff is great. It´s going down within seconds to AT and especially the British. Now there´s a reason again to go for Tigers and instead of mirroring an IS-2, they gave it range. That opens up for some great new playstyles. Also a Tiger that needs to be used at range is quite realistic. I also like that. Improves the immersion of the game. Or to put it into game terms: Having a Tiger firing from far range is more fun and less silly than it always rushing a position to catch targets. TDs still have a range advantage over it, you just have to use them smartly now. Can´t wait to kick some ass with it on veterancy 2 with 20% increased range. In: Lobby
Thread: Brace4 Sep 2015, 12:36 PM Brace is over the top and blatantly overpowered. You assemble the supposed "hardcounters" such as artillery as Axis player. And all the opponent has to do is press one button and is almost immune. This is bad gameplay and horrible design. Brace forces a huge investment for the Axis player into artillery, which then does´t even work. The British player is rewarded for sitting around on one place. One would think Lelic had learned their lesson from Coh1. But alas Cancer-Brits are back. Edit: I wonder whether that shit can survive a railway artillery strike. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panther is overperforming?4 Sep 2015, 12:01 PM In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brits Release Ninjas3 Sep 2015, 13:45 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2015, 00:47 AMCruzz Nerfed: Priest, B4, Katyusha, Panzerwerfer (reduced aoe damage modifiers), Scott (reduced aoe size), Sturmtiger (aoe distance and far damage) Hahaha, this is adding insult to injury. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Upcoming Patch Balance Preview by Jason Lee2 Sep 2015, 21:02 PM RIP Ostheer mortar. StuG goes from good to "meh". In: Lobby
Thread: 1600 health tanks.2 Sep 2015, 14:43 PM It´s pretty obvious they tried hard to make a faction that matches the Germans tanks. Too hard... A much more useful Panther with the gun of a Tiger as someone said it (Comet) or a beefed up heavy (Churchill), combined with a beefed up Jackson (Firefly) for AT. Why would I even choose to go OKW? To get some tank that is matched by its counterpart, yet costs me effectively 30% fuel more? No thanks. Also taking "target weakpoint" into account, which seems necessary vs Churchills: Pak40 > Raketenwerfer. StuG G > Jagdpanzer IV. We will have to see, but I predict that Ostheer is the way to go. In: COH2 Balance