Profile of JohnnyB

Need to send Axis fanboys into GULAGS
Ye, the axis lobby are more powerful in community than allies, becouse we fap fap fap at germans tanks and another lier propaganda stuff . Just look how many thread are axis cry about balance, guard motor (maybe 90% of them Kappa). This all situation are like in politics, axis are always majority (and lobby there interest to play more easy) in Senat/Rada/parliament and another and allies are opposition with clever ideas and cool leaders .

I don't think Axis fanboys tears river is bigger than Allied fanboys tears river, on the contrary, if I think at the amount of OKW OP threads in the past I could say that the biggest whiners are among allied fanboys. You are a fanboy yourself, the proof is this verry post you wrote.

Volks should have the same Population like Riflemen while being far worse than them?
With all the nerfs they got I don't see any reason why they should be nerfed even further.

Unit costs are not calculated by their vetted state, but their initial state.
A vet 3 Su85 is also far more worth than 125 fuel, yet it's pop/costs are unaffected by that.
A JP4 at vet 5 is probably worth over 200 fuel, but when you buy it, it is not.
By that logic we can make all okw units or all units that have good vet even more expensive and more popcap intense.

I don't see why this is even an issue. Overwhelmed by OKW P4 spam? The popcap for the medium tanks is fine imo, no adjustment needed.

Because OKW is OP. Why? Because it's OKW. See the logic here?

Because ISG will easily defeat maxim spam and inf blobs Sovietof. yep.

If it will be cheaper, it will have a chance. One ISG on map almost means nothing. 2 ISGs on map are something to be feared.

Meanwhile, that expensive grens cost the same 240 mp as the cheap cons.
That expensive grens reinforce full squad for 90mp while the cheap cons need 100mp.
That expensive grens don't need to flank, because they have Rnades that expensive grens also don't need to spend additional 25 fuel to use the Rnade. They also don't need to spend another 25 fuel to use inferior soft AT.

How come that cheap cons need MORE resources invested to them then these poor expensive grens and still are inferior to them?

Alex dropped on bullshit greatly recently, but knowing physics, nothing disappears into the void, I can tell all of his previous bullshit have found shelter in you.

You're completely clueless.

As long as cons and penals stay as they are, soviet meta will always center around call-ins.
While not tanks anymore, the need for doctrinal infantry is as strong as it ever was.
Even cheaper volks bring incomparably more to the table, have better doctrinal abilities, have better scaling and fight better at late game.

If a gren squad is reduced to one model, it will cost 90 mp to fully reinforce. If a con squad is reduced to one model it will cost 100 mp to fully reinforce. The only difference is that for 100 mp soviet squad gains 5 models while a gren squad gains 3 models. Savy?

Don't sell me your bullshit'cause I don't buy it.

That expensive gren squad cannot flank that easily even if it wanted, because it doesn't have the "ouwaaa" feature. Since when the rifle nade makes flanking for grens as "not needed"? What is the average models kill when a rifle nade hits a maxim? 2? 3? From 6 models? But if I lolotov one MG it needs quick whithdraw/relocation or I will lose that squad. Those upgrades that costs fuel for soviet conscripts means that all conscripts on map can use them. In order to further teching you will not have to buy phases and unlock tires, so you have an OPTION to buy those upgrades or not and spend your fuel to build tires and quickly hit me with a T70 or even T34 while I am still thinking if I should buy shrecks or build a PAK.

If cons stomp your volks in the first minutes of the game and you lose map control, how can vetting them will help you in any way smart ass? If you don't help them with 1-2 sturmpio squads or a kubel, it's over since startgame.

When searching for bullsit depots you need to carefully search inside. If Alex dropped his "bullshit" you certainly didn't drop yours and it still infects the forums.
You are not clueless, how you imply that I am, but completely ill-intentioned, wanting to screw up balance in soviet's favor since the beggining of times, on two forums (at least).

I'm sorry, but I don't think grens are performing in middle game neither. Their 4 models are wiped like hell and there's nothing you can do about it. You can't change cons and let grens as they are. I admit cons are weak, but they are cheap and have abilities like ourrah, which helps them flank, At nades, molotovs. They are an infatry unit designed to fill the battlefield and cause problems for opponents not as a powerfull strike force. People who want buffs for them just want to blob them and fuck around the map until heavy/mid vehicles are comming. Soviets may obtain good infantry combos if they mix in equal quantities conscripts with guards or add some shocks next to their cons. Not to mention the tank hunters doctrine where cons are anything but weak with the PTRS upgrade. In addition, with the incoming maxim buff, cons will get a nice support with these HMGs and their overall performance in game will be better while supported.

Finaly, I would want some AI buff for volks too, (don't know if you noted HOW WEAK are volks in startgame compared to cons, they simply cannot resist against them), but I don't know if this will be such a good idea.

Manny kids people around here just want buff this or this one, thinking nothing related to their required changes impact.