Profile of NinjaWJ

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2070

General Information


Thread: OBK lategame is broken beyond all reason.11 Sep 2014, 14:19 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2014, 11:59 AMJohnnyB That explains all. 4v4. Pfff.... I wouldn't complain about balance related to 4v4. Wtf is this game? Counter-strike? battlefield ? The only balance that matters is 1v1 and 2v2. That is the base. The balance is done stating from 1v1 and ending with 2v2. What is beyond CANNOT be balanced and it won't ever be. That is a poor attitude. 4v4 exists and SHOULD be balanced. Nice comparisons with an FPS.... Why should it end with 2v2? I like the idea of slowing down tech progression in team games. Right now, medium tanks can be pumped out around 12-15 minutes. Late game basically begins at 20 minutes. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Future of the Soviet Faction11 Sep 2014, 14:09 PM I hope the developers realize this, the boring and annoying style of Soviet play have been the talk of this forum for awhile now. can anyone tell me why Ost is considered bad as well? looks like they have a pretty natural tech progression except for complaints with T4. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Future of the Soviet Faction11 Sep 2014, 12:29 PM A simple price decrease this patch would have helped, but absolutely nohing. A faction with only halfheir units being used is just terrible design. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Future of the Soviet Faction11 Sep 2014, 05:07 AM Hello guys it is NinjaWJ, your resident Soviet-only player. I was very excited hearing about the patch. There were many changes to USA, OKW, and Ostheer. However, there were barely any changes to USSR, so I was very dissappointed. Does this mean Relic believes Soviets are fine, or does it mean the issues need further time to fix? Obviously, people are up in arms about maxims, snipers, Isu152, call-ins, penal buff, su76 etc. I am not sure why there is not any official word on the progress of soviet changes. It really is frustrating that barely any work was put in on this patch on addressing these issues. What do you guys think? Are bigger changes on the way? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Petition: Fix Old Patch Replays11 Sep 2014, 04:36 AM /singed heheehheee In: Lobby
Thread: Ninja changes for 9.9 patch11 Sep 2014, 04:30 AM Relax Sierra. SP still good as a mid/close range T0 unit. It can win fights early versus any t0 unit up close. Its close range damage was nerfed but it still rocks as a flanker unit In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stormpioneers post patch11 Sep 2014, 04:20 AM Fighting SP as Soviets feel a little better, Prepatch they could walk right up to you and wipe your squad. However, even with the durability changes to SP, and closerange DPS reduction, SPs dont seem to rape conscripts every single time anymore. They mgiht even lose a unit now when closing it. Still deadly when flanking, but allows a little more room for some counterplay In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Call-in design philosophy - backwards? 11 Sep 2014, 04:14 AM yes great suggestions!! Teching should always be a good choice instead of waiting solely for call-ins. What the hell is the point of building god damn buildings if there is no incentive In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Call-in design philosophy - backwards? 11 Sep 2014, 00:14 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2014, 22:12 PMastro_zombie I'm glad you're thinking about it, but what you said implies that this HASN'T been thought about already, and I wonder how this could be true. We've seen so much discussion on here about this very topic and it's so blindingly obvious from just playing the game that this system is so wrong. yes it is actually a scary thought. i was thinking the same thing when the relic person made that comment. i wonder if they grasp the severity of the issue. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Close the Pocket10 Sep 2014, 21:06 PM Yeah things that are imba usually magnify itself in large team games In: COH2 Gameplay