Profile of NinjaWJ

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2070

General Information


Thread: Win-Lose-Ratio 29.9.-25.10.2014 (1v1 and 4v4)30 Oct 2014, 12:57 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Oct 2014, 10:22 AMOZtheWiZARD What's the point of this topic? Is it only to inform because it doesn't represent the state of the balance whatsoever. Maybe when you will find a way to do it for only top 10ers assuming skill level was equally distributed across all factions. why not? this has the top 200. We could probably assume that top 200 players have the mechanics down and don't possess significant L2P issues, In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU-152 Overnerfed30 Oct 2014, 12:54 PM people were complaining that the ISU and Jagdtigers changes were the WRONG changes. I am pretty sure that people agree that they need to be changed, but the proposed changes in the beta were the wrong way to go and i agree with the people. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU-152 Overnerfed30 Oct 2014, 05:17 AM have faith everyone. they will be changed...SOON(TM) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU-152 Overnerfed30 Oct 2014, 03:13 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Oct 2014, 02:59 AMAchtAchter Looks like the abusers have won, lets enjoy another patch circle of isu vs jagdtiger. aaaaand Jagdtiger wins In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 29 Oct Patch Bugs30 Oct 2014, 01:56 AM Wow....anyone test these things!!!!!?!?! In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: PATCH NOTES !29 Oct 2014, 20:53 PM patch notesssss LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO In: Lobby
Thread: ISU-152 Overnerfed29 Oct 2014, 20:34 PM WE shouldn't bring history into this! The Axis are better than Allies in every way possible! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Win-Lose-Ratio 29.9.-25.10.2014 (1v1 and 4v4)29 Oct 2014, 18:46 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Oct 2014, 18:09 PMAchtAchter What annoys me, when I go 3vs3, 4vs4 you get 4-6 matches in a row where you do nothing but stomp new players which have ranks with 4 digits or are even unranked, while me and my random mates mostly being top 200 players. Thus I blame the matchmaking. . Probably because everyone stopped playing 4v4 or switched to Axis and all you got are the newbies In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Win-Lose-Ratio 29.9.-25.10.2014 (1v1 and 4v4)29 Oct 2014, 18:44 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Oct 2014, 15:49 PMspam.r33k i mentioned this before, but that basically means its random team games only... which undermines a lot of its ability to reflect the influence balance has on bigger team(!!!) games (even if one of the top 200 players did in fact play random 2v2,3v3,4v4 it doesnt necissarily mean that his opponents were a randomly assembled too. could have been a stacked team) you often see streamers play wth stacked teams against randomly assembled teams and stomp them hard... none of these games influence the stats at all but yeah look at those graphs and pretend to have found the holy grail I think random is a lot better data than AT. There are a lot more variables when AT are involved such as communication, player skill, trust, etc. When it is only random players, only player skill is important and the faction In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Win-Lose-Ratio 29.9.-25.10.2014 (1v1 and 4v4)29 Oct 2014, 18:06 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Oct 2014, 15:54 PMludd3emm I must say NinjaWJ that you are incredibly lazy not to upload the pictures here and not even giving us the link to the original thread on the official forum. This is what it should look like: http://www.coh2.org/topic/24745/win-lose-ratio-from-15.9.--25.9.2014-much-more/ Other than that, this shows us yet again how ridiculous OKW is in team games and Ostheers numbers are probably improved by having OKW team mates. I don't know how to put images on the website sorry. I only put the charts here because I thought that was the bread and butter of the post. my bad In: COH2 Balance