Profile of kamk

Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2015, 10:47 AMTheMachine

Is it definitely 20%? I heard it was 25%.

Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2015, 09:19 AMtroyquigley

is it any good ?

Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2015, 09:23 AMOZtheWiZARD

Just to clarify its not about using it right here. I am well aware when my HMGs were out of position. I don't have problems with that. I'm not asking for MG42 to become this uber infantry counter once was.

It's just I noticed recently how effective Maxim is in comparison. Soviets don't need HMG soo strong while OH do. I always thought MG42 should be the best HMG in the game and that's not the case.
Maxim in a building is a different story. If it wasn't for M5 we would have seen more Maxim spam.

Jump back to quoted post24 Aug 2015, 17:12 PMSwitzerland

The list defined units with high pen, which goes to the point of what USF lacks. So it's defined for a purpose, I don't feel Pershing is the exclusive answer myself, still would be A welcome addition. But moreover changes to existing units Manley the AT gun and Bazooka might help more long term.

Jump back to quoted post24 Aug 2015, 17:45 PMAustralian Magic

Well, but we can agree that M10s, 57mm and Shermans will fail against Tiger Ace, or KT+JT combo. You can't outrange them, you have low chance to pen front armor, you can't flank (beacause of map or because of mines/paks/shcrecks and even if you do, there is high chance you will lose your M10s while KT will survive with almost no health.

Jump back to quoted post25 Aug 2015, 03:28 AMVonIvan

...