Profile of Rifleman89

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 66

General Information
Steam: 76561197977800420


Thread: Pak40 to T1 - it's needed.11 Sep 2015, 17:19 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2015, 17:15 PMSwonVIP ah dont like the idea... the Pak40 is really powerful it shouldnt move to T1 But the idea of an uncounterable flame WASP or AA HT is a good idea and needed "to put OH in its place?" You see that coming out in your expression here...yes? It would be great to have a better counter to them other than full retreat until I can get pak out without hampering my field presence up to that point. Or at least the the option to make that decision as other factions do. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pak40 to T1 - it's needed.11 Sep 2015, 17:18 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2015, 12:33 PMMoBo111 If the WASP is that much of a problem for you in the 3 minutes it is on the field until the 222 or the pak arrive i don't think the WASP is your only problem.... So, as always l2p and don't forget to smoke and flank And by the time a 222 comes out their is usually an AT GUN waiting behind the WASP or other mentioned vehicle that wipes it quickly. BECAUSE EVERYONE ELSE GETS IT WITH THEIR FIRST BUILDING/UPGRADE.... You're helping prove the point I'm making... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pak40 to T1 - it's needed.11 Sep 2015, 17:15 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2015, 15:33 PMNEVEC No, thanks. P4 appear enough early. Way earlier than sherman. This isn't about mid game tanks, it's more about early light tanks and vehicles and having a dedicated AT LIKE ALL OTHER FACTIONS HAVE A CHOICE TO MAKE--EARLIER than OH. It would be nice to have the same choice. Wow, so many attempts to change the topic instead of discussing the topic offered.... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pak40 to T1 - it's needed.11 Sep 2015, 17:13 PM Let's see Brits get AT gun with their first built/bought building. USF get AT gun with their first built/bought building. Russians can get AT gun with a first built /bought building. OKW get one with a fist built/bought building. BUT it's not good enough for OH. It breaks the game, so say many of you. Changing it into an OP cry when I don't have a problem with a unit being the best in its genre within the game regardless of faction (and saying so doesn't make it OP, per se, as others claim I'm saying, which I'm not). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pak40 to T1 - it's needed.11 Sep 2015, 17:05 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2015, 16:34 PMShanka Pak at t2 is great, faust do the job Not really ... if that were true OH wouldn't be driven from the field or wiped when these units hit the field that the faust is the "almighty counter to." In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pak40 to T1 - it's needed.11 Sep 2015, 09:24 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2015, 06:42 AMCarlos Danger Only if the Panzerfaust then requires Battle Phase 1. Honestly, I'd rather just see light armor arrive later in the game. So you're in favor of removing he Bren carrier from T0 for the Brits? And delaying AAHT so that Pak40 has a chance to be on the field as they arrive?? Would be the same affect as moving Pak to T1...either way would be be what I was proposing, so sure! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pak40 to T1 - it's needed.11 Sep 2015, 09:20 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2015, 09:11 AMKatitof I have a better idea, if you feel like you need early game AT gun-PLAY OKW. I have my team and faction preference...just like you and the Russians get a AT gun CHOICE from a first building. I'd like the same choice... WHY IS THAT SUCH A GAME BREAKING NOTION, to have a reliable AT for Ost when it is most needed? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pak40 to T1 - it's needed.11 Sep 2015, 09:08 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2015, 19:23 PMQueenRatchet123 Make shreks free while you're at it No That's just absurd..and noone indicated that..please stay on topic -1 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pak40 to T1 - it's needed.11 Sep 2015, 09:05 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2015, 17:30 PMVonIvan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ It appears to be pretty one sided at the moment. Playing constant CATCH-UP REACTION is destroying Axis play and it isn't L2P - we don't have the tools we need early enough to put up a good fight. ONE SIDED WITH RESPECT TO REACTION NOT "OPness" I don't see you trying to refute my claims and that it isn't a true statement of what I've proposed. claiming I'm yelling "the sky is falling!!!! They're too OP!!!!" doesn't address the issue on whether it is true or not. Recall the question...at what point should the allies have to react to Axis?? Because right now the way the game is , it's hard to see axis forcing allies to make dotrinal choice or unit choices based on Axis play...but it sure feels the other way around for axis. THAT IS THE FOCUS OF THE THREAD..... You're forcing the issue of OP when it wasn't there.... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pak40 to T1 - it's needed.11 Sep 2015, 09:03 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2015, 16:25 PMMoBo111 Ostheer doesn't need an at gun from minute 1 on to counter something like the bren or the m3, you got a faust isn't that enough for you? In that case learn to use it..... You get to t2 fast enough to counter stronger light vehicles like the aa halftrack.. and if you don't, gg for you vs us and sovs... and "play on for another 10 minutes until you get one" vs brits. To sum it up.. it's ok and not needed if you don't want to mess up balance, or do the allies have a zis in t1 because a 222 could arrive? The WASP gets flamers before t2 unless you leave yourself undermanned on the field.. therefore faust is not a counter..flames wipe or force retreat long before a faust can go off especially when supported by tommies in cover. In: COH2 Balance