Yeah I though I had it in the bag but the KT surprised me and lost....
Well, isn't this awkward... Anyways, I addressed your post on GameReplays.ORG a little bit ago, and I am going to fully explain why I came out victorious and ultimately defeated you.
First off, you went RIFLE COMPANY as U.S. Forces... Please tell me how my non-vet Volksgrenadiers with bolt-action K98ks are supposed to hold an even amount of ground with a unit that has semo-auto rifles with dps that will outmatch that of my units at almost ANY given range, besides farthest, WHEN THEY DON'T HAVE insta-vet. Second, since I'm certain you watched the replay several times and attempted to thoroughly analyze the engagements, I never essentially lost enough ground to where I couldn't get a respectable amount of income. Axis as it stands doesn't generally excel early-to-mid game, whereas Allies do. Keeping that in mind, wouldn't it make sense for OKW to possess an exceptionally potent late-game unit? That's the King Tiger! I do admit it should be tweaked a bit, but unlike most casual players out there who lean towards a specific faction/side, I don't think it should be nerfed into the ground to where it would be strategically unviable to even attempt to utilize it. Lastly, you probably had enough fuel to replace the losses that I inflicted and spawn out more Easy Eights (correct me if I'm wrong, I haven't watched your replay since I saw it on GameReplays a couple of days ago). The King Tiger was literally what was keeping me relevant against your meta-immersed vet Riflemen. You probably surrendered prematurely, but regardless of what could have occurred, I came out the victor since I managed to hold out against your Riflemen. In other words, this isn't a matter of "balance", it's a "L2P" issue, entirely.
If you can coherently, and credibly interject, I'd be happy to address your feedback.