1 In SNF the games were the ones with the mixed teams ,which were literally some of the most onesided games ive seen but that is due to the other side not knowing really how to conter the synergies of the mixed team since they had less experience on that and on the game design which really gives mixed teams both versatility and strenght in early mid and late game .
I haven't followed the whole topic so I'm not going to discuss the points you guys are making, but this is just wrong. While I could agree that the second game was one-sided, the first one clearly wasn't. Just watch it again: in the early game they almost completely pushed us off the map and took us down to 34 VPs (against their 485), and both our strategies revolved around getting the opponent's cut-off; they pushed for our cut-off early, we pushed them off and then took their cut-off. And their loss is more due to the fact that they relied on a single piece of heavy armor to deal with our whole army than anything else. Had their IS-2s been supported by a couple SU-85s and conscripts to prevent rams (and T-34s of their own?) things wouldn't have gone that way.