Profile of Sierra

Jump back to quoted post6 Jul 2015, 02:51 AMGrumpy

The fuel to munition is gives way too much fuel, especially on a larger map. Also, being near the edge of a large map is worse than being on a small map.

On maps like Lienne, with the fuel to ammo conversion you can hit almost 200 ammo per minute, enough to keep all of your strafes on cooldown.

Assuming the image loads, you'll see seven squads that had been suppressed by one strafe. One of the squads was outside the boundaries of the red smoke but it suppressed anyway.

Jump back to quoted post4 Jul 2015, 02:14 AMNuclear Arbitor

gren's weakness isn't in them being poor at close combat though, it's that that's the best range for most of the infantry they'll face.

removing the RG and replacing it with a hand grenade would make grens stronger at close range but it would drastically weaken their long range and the increase in their close range would be negated by player skill and attention.

i don't think grens need to have the RG swapped with an HG (changes to the RG would be enough) but overall such a change would be a nerf to grens, not a buff.

Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2015, 07:02 AMEsxile

I'm glad to read 4 280mp cost vanilla unit should always been beaten by 240mp HMG and 240mp grenadiers.
Now everything is cristal clear, Ostheer is designed to be the strongest faction early game while having cheapest dedicated units.

1270mp + 25fu invested, probably 30 or 60 ammo used to counter a 240mp unit in a building. And the best, the 240mp unit wasn't even supported.

Made my day

Jump back to quoted post29 Jun 2015, 22:54 PMRobocopHighlander

A major problem with the unit now is the speed it can pick up and reposition itself. In combination with the fast suppression it makes flanking practically impossible in a lot of map positions and also makes abilities like the molotov completely useless. If the unit is going to be so effective it should go back to having a longer setup and reposition time.

Jump back to quoted post28 Jun 2015, 22:27 PMThunderhun

Not trying to be a dick but having recon throught the whole stage of the game isnt a thing.

On topic: Mg-42s are fine against Soviets as they have plenty of tool to counter them. USF suffers from the MG-42s because it shuts down T0 and T1 (with AP rounds + tellers); having zero recon and early indirect fire is the biggest setback for USF. Also the huge sight on the pios prevent most of the flanks.

For those who say L2P;. show us your master skill