Profile of Corsin

Make demo charges only usable on objects (buildings/bridges ect)
Fix squad spacing and done.

Cost for T3 - The cost for T3 depends hugely on the "powerlevel" of T3 units. If you nerf all of said units, you don't necessarily need to increase the fuel cost.

T70 Light tank - The T70 is totally overshadowed by the Quadmount. For the fuel cost it performs appropriately, although i would prefer a slight reduction in AI capabilities (think Stuart) and slight fuel cut, to give it more the role of an affordable scout and less of a two-shotting-clumped-up-squads-in-seconds unit.

M5 Halftrack - The Quad does not need to shred light vehicles in 1 or 2 bursts. It wins against every light vehicle except Puma. To make it a more even match between the 222 or 251/17 it should receive reduced penetration, damage or armor.

Even with a 40 fuel price tag it would still be a jack-of-all-trades.


SU76 - Poor SU76. Nobody used to love you. And now that you shine, your light is to bright.

The SU76 benefits greatly in conjunction with the quad - if you nerf the quad, you nerf the SU76.

There is no real need for the much more expensive SU85, because the SU76 already does an excellent job even against heavier tanks. The SU85 should be desirably as a main tank destroyer, therefore i would reduce the penetration or range on the SU76. It could receive a camouflage ability in return, so it stays relevant with proper use.


That said, i think T4 needs more incentive to be build. Currently T3 is enough to bridge the gap between ISU, IS2 or M4C and only the Katyusha offers real value. A better buildable, non-doctrinal tank than the T34 would go a long way.

Thanks for keeping us on track. Agreed with your post too.

What data? those are my personal preferences you tool lol.

So there's alot of SU76 and M5 threads floating about, thought it would be a good idea to stick all ideas/thoughts in 1 topic.

This thread will address each unit in Soviet T3 and the cost of soviet T3. (please keep replies and your opinions in this sorta structure).

Cost for T3 - I think the cost for soviet T3 is 10 fuel too cheap. (since they start with 50 and can save 10 fuel by going T1).

T70 Light tank - I feel this tank is in a good place and is a good price for what it brings to the field. However it could use a tiny bit more acceleration to better get out of the range of AT guns.

M5 Halftrack - This unit currently only really over-performs when it is upgraded with the quad cannon. However can be used as an early double flamer vehicle.
It does arrive too early but i think that could be helped with the first point of T3 cost. To balance the unit itself, i would suggest ONE of the following...
- 10 fuel cost increase
- Quad armor pen nerf (quite heavy)
- Change quad upgrade from 120 ammo to 100mp + 25 fuel. (To bring it in line with the USF and OKW flacktracks)
- Give it a setup time.

SU76 - I think its a good call to move this unit to T3 to give soviets some decent mid game T3 with the light vehicles. However i feel it overperforms for its cost and is spammable. Fixes id suggest for this are.. (Again id only want ONE of these used, not all).

- Fuel increase of 5
- AP decrease of 30 (its currently 10 higher than the stug).
- Ammo cost on Barrage (30)
- Turning speed decrease so it is easier to flank a group of them.
- Range decrease on the barrage so AT guns can be more effective vs them.

It did got fuel cost increase.

Yeah of 5... not really enough for a buff of 80 hp and DOUBLE its penetration (to 180, which is 10 less than the current stug).

Especially now it arrives alot sooner.