And bump their cost to 280?
Because cheap unit standing up to expensive one on similar weapon profile sounds imbalanced.
Plus, it would completely destroy any balance dynamic vs soviets, unless you want to give them stock weapon upgrades as well.
How about keep their cost at 240.... but when you build a new squad after the upgrade, they arrive 4/5. Thus making the player need to invest another 30 off the bat.
(makes them cost 270 without making them a resource heavy unit). |
i like the principle of this.
and add one more truck that is solely about upgrading units.
Sure if the units wernt total shit...
You build 1 truck... you can get one worthless unit until your next truck... and need all 3 trucks to have a chance vs anything.
If you wanna kill OKW this is the way to go. |
|
KT - Buff HP to 1600 and sorted... still able to be hit and kited by everything but at least its got a chance to get outa there before the marked target + TD's reck it.
Nvm just realized we're talking about an axis unit. I forgot an axis unit with 1600 hp or a buff of any kind is taboo in company of Allies. |
“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”
― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
Play 100 games as allies. You'll see strongest features of axis.
Or like me play 20 and get into the top 100 as Soviets xD
Or play some as brits and never lose...
Sun Tzu's art of war only applies if the opponents are balanced. In this game they are clearly not. |
But people like so much axis visuals, panzers and playing bad guys!
This is at least the excuse they were using for last 2 and a half year 
Apparently it was all about the balance at the end
Nope, i still usually play axis...
Pretty much entirely for the visuals/theme.
Allies are only more popular because brits are new, and cool!  |
|
try, IS Vickers, IS, tech, Sniper, RE, AT |
|
Its amusing people think that flamer could ever be put on volks.
1 - It would be pretty OP
2 - They only do that kinda game breaking shit for allies (e.g Croc/KV8 while flamers are OP, and then they bring out the flame Hetzer AFTER the fix where the allies were able to screw axis W/L ratios with it, Centaur vastly outperforming its german AA counterpart that has the same fuel cost... and so on.....) get with the times! |
<.< >.> I'm out of the loop, what ability is that? Molotov (which didn't destroy bunkers last time I checked)?
2 does lol |
|
I think the issue isnt Pgrens.... but a lack of shock infantry on the Axis side...
Pgrens and Sturmpio's are good ect... (mid rage)
But still get butchered by Shocks/Commandos/Thompsons. The axis doesn't really have any equivalent to the point black bum rape units that the allies do and its only gonna become more obvious when the rangers get here. |
Not trying to defend the S1montaur here, just curious; is it actually that imbalanced? Isn't it just its broken house-clearing power that is horrible??
Other than that, it's a pretty late impact-unit, as I see it.
Perhaps he shouldn't have floated 200 fuel and only be in tier 2? The house-clearing is broken, but other than that what I saw didn't seem strange.
yeah it overperforms... it can easily kill any squad 2 bursts (and while they are retreating). Same for pak-crews and ever more so against raketen werfer crews, which are more bunched up, and the AOE of the shots basically instantly wipes them. |
United Kingdom
Relic Entertainment
