Profile of y3ivan

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 157

General Information


Thread: USA M1(ATgun) Balanced? Or OKW P4 unbalanced?14 Sep 2021, 03:07 AM btw what the RNG chances of PIV first shot killing 2/4 of M1 57mm AT gunners from the front? and the rest is history. i havent seen any tanks other than PIV and brummbar able to snipe half of the AT gun crew in the first shot. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF and MP bleed9 Sep 2021, 07:32 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2021, 18:58 PMVaz Actually, the aaht was the focus of multiple nerfs if memory serves. Consecutive too. 1v1 players felt that when they played usf it was too easy for them to lock out their opponents. It was quite the offensive beast when it came out. The machine guns actually shot bullets instead of nerf darts. The main cannon actually hit infantry and would mess them up. I think the suppression applied like the mg42 as well, it had this large area of effect that could stop large blobs pretty quick. it was sort of a buff and a nerf at the sametime. they made it slightly sluggish however it can fire 360deg angle arc unlike the locked 210 deg rear facing arc. The damage of the 40mm bofors was nerf too, which in my opinion is good thing. The biggest change is the timing of it, the old AAHT could be out during the first 5min in 1v1 games which has a huge impact on early and mid game before any direct counters against it. Apparently Ostheer players dont like it, hence it was delayed behind tech requirements for a unit that dependent on early to mid game to shine. Note that OKW has the same amount bullshit AAHT early game, hence they were locked behind tech too. USF at the current state, most player would just prefer M5stuart because it come out earlier and its less frustrating to micro at mid to late game In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Osttruppen9 Sep 2021, 06:39 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2021, 12:54 PMaerafield the good old days when Osttruppen were 120 manpower to build, 10mp to reinforce and had a de-/capture rate of 50% aah the good ol times of marching 15 squads of prosttrupen headon into the soviet maxim spam just like WW1 In: Lobby
Thread: Osttruppen8 Sep 2021, 12:20 PM prosttruppen were originally design as cheap defensive meatshields for the other glass cannon 4men osther infantry units. Consider back then Soviets have pre-nerf oneshot 120mm mortar, B4, ISU152, IS2. etc.. somewhere down the timeline the purpose was changed into gren V2. my personal option, osttruppen should go back to their original design (meatshields) In: Lobby
Thread: USF and MP bleed5 Sep 2021, 07:27 AM rifles is the only USF mainline infantry. the rest are elite/specialist. Rifles are very fragile late game, having 6 men squad mitigate the issue. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What is up with M8A1(Scott) change?3 Sep 2021, 06:04 AM i think someone at relic doing the balance didnt know what is projectile Scatter, large radius splash damage and blobs have in common. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF and MP bleed3 Sep 2021, 05:45 AM if looking at pop cap efficiency USF is at good spot at pop cap, riflemen 7 pop which is a big plus compare to penals at 8pop. I dont even know when was it changed. Soviets comparatively, conscripts at 7pop, penals at 8pop and T34/85 at 14pop. Soviets are not even that good either. However thats another topic to discussed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF and MP bleed2 Sep 2021, 02:40 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Sep 2021, 02:27 AMVaz It's not more men that's needed, it's more effective fighters. Throwing more bodies at elite stock AI doesn't really help. historically, this fits to 1944/5 USF strategy. having extra 1 men in the squad gives 20% staying power in the frontlines. and MP reduction will help with the trade off. This is not inclusive of nerfs to certain overperforming OKW units. secondly I believe USF infantry early game vs Axis is at a good spot. This is the last thing that needs changing In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF and MP bleed2 Sep 2021, 01:44 AM why not add squads size upgrade at T3 (major)? cost 100MP and 15 FU riflemen 5men -> 6men, Reinforce cost 27MP -> 25MP Rear echelon 4men -> 5men, Reinforce cost 23MP -> 20MP HMG 4men -> 5men, Reinforce cost 22MP -> 18MP 57mm AT gun 4men -> 5men, Reinforce cost 22MP -> 18MP In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why are REs 200mp?26 Aug 2021, 17:18 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2021, 09:38 AMKurobane This is exactly why I am advocating for them to Cost 300 Manpower and to start as a 5 man squad. The last thing we want is to go back to the Rear Echelon Spam days. Hence the price increase. The Extra Squad Member would be enough to make it unique (the only 5 man Engineer Squad) and would help with OKW matchups(easily the most difficult start out of all the allied factions due to RE being useless vs SturmPioneers) and you only really need 1 squad for cache building and the extra squad member would assist with repairing. It wouldn't impact Whermacht matchups and would help vs Sturmpioneer. It would be a solid change, and a fair trade especially if you consider that a new Vet 3 would have to be added(since the current Vet 3 is the 5th Squad Member) it would make the unit more useful overall. i wouldnt even pay 200MP 5pop even if RE comes with 5 man squad. RE DPS is dogshit tier In: COH2 Balance