Login

russian armor

Advanced Warfare Tactics

4 Sep 2019, 23:58 PM
#1
avatar of MrBananaGrabber.
Patrion 26

Posts: 328


As some of the commanders are getting tweaked, it might be worth changing the IL-2 Sturmovik Attacks for 'Advanced Warfare Tactics' to a loiter, rather than a one off strafe.

It's a small change but would improve the commander.
5 Sep 2019, 00:56 AM
#2
avatar of borobadger

Posts: 184

They could even just improve the strafe as it's complete garbage in it's current state.
5 Sep 2019, 01:26 AM
#3
avatar of Hon3ynuts

Posts: 818

Significant change of missing and also a significant chance of doing nothing even if you target it correctly.

Let them auto acquire targets like JU87s, Sturmovic loiter, Supression planes ect.

All the abilities which let you choose plane mg targets are terrible because of their inconsistency.
5 Sep 2019, 02:52 AM
#4
avatar of ShadowLinkX37
Director of Moderation Badge

Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4

The strafe isn't garbage, its UI indictator is off. You need to place it farther than intended for it to actually hit its mark.
5 Sep 2019, 03:25 AM
#5
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

The strafe isn't garbage, its UI indictator is off. You need to place it farther than intended for it to actually hit its mark.


That should still be fixed, at the least.
5 Sep 2019, 03:39 AM
#6
avatar of LoopDloop

Posts: 3053



That should still be fixed, at the least.

+1

IMO the strafe overall should be more consistent too. I'm a big fan of strafes over loiters since they're (IMO) less frustrating for both sides and take more skills, but that's given that both work correctly.
5 Sep 2019, 04:36 AM
#7
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2



That should still be fixed, at the least.


https://www.coh2.org/topic/45616/il2-stuka-single-strafe-run-tracking-bug



Added 2 Issues to our database



3 Dec 2015 :hansGG:
5 Sep 2019, 04:38 AM
#8
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

At this point, just scrap it and replace it with the IL2 rocket strafe.
5 Sep 2019, 07:59 AM
#9
avatar of Serrith

Posts: 783

At this point, just scrap it and replace it with the IL2 rocket strafe.



Or the guard's IL-2 callin from the same commander.
5 Sep 2019, 08:12 AM
#10
avatar of Bobo

Posts: 5

At this point, just scrap it and replace it with the IL2 rocket strafe.

This would make this commander my number one pick. 2Cp Ppsh, radio intercept, rocket strafe and the T34-85.
5 Sep 2019, 09:05 AM
#11
avatar of tightrope
Senior Caster Badge
Patrion 39

Posts: 1194 | Subs: 29



https://www.coh2.org/topic/45616/il2-stuka-single-strafe-run-tracking-bug



3 Dec 2015 :hansGG:


Actually I believe the UI indicator was fixed during Mr Smiths time. The ability just sucks.

edit: Did a couple tests and it still looks like the payload is heavily weighted to the back half but not to the level of your screenshot.
5 Sep 2019, 10:01 AM
#12
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

Maybe one could add a second weapon with a couple of shot that track in skill shots so that they can deliver more consistent damage.
5 Sep 2019, 10:26 AM
#13
avatar of Osinyagov
Senior Modmaker Badge

Posts: 1389 | Subs: 1

Or maybe make it as Airguards vet 1 ability (supressing)? Or like USF AI strafe (supressing and a bit of damage)
5 Sep 2019, 12:50 PM
#14
avatar of MrBananaGrabber.
Patrion 26

Posts: 328

jump backJump back to quoted post5 Sep 2019, 08:12 AMBobo

This would make this commander my number one pick. 2Cp Ppsh, radio intercept, rocket strafe and the T34-85.


+1
5 Sep 2019, 15:39 PM
#15
avatar of Kirrik

Posts: 573

More commanders would be viable if they had SVT Cons upgrade instead of PPSh, that upgrade got power creeped into oblivion, 60 munitions and 2 CP for 3 PPSh with 10 DPS vs weapon drop at CP 1 giving Penals 6 14 DPS PPShs
5 Sep 2019, 16:31 PM
#16
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2



Actually I believe the UI indicator was fixed during Mr Smiths time. The ability just sucks.

edit: Did a couple tests and it still looks like the payload is heavily weighted to the back half but not to the level of your screenshot.


Note that when i did the test, this was the limit at which the IL2 will track outside of what you would expect from the UI
I rechecked this couple of months before without much concern about how much further you could track and arrived at the same conclusions as you did.

Bad + bug = useless.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

849 users are online: 849 guests
0 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49115
Welcome our newest member, Pound309
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM