...Oh, so you say that to a player like VonIvan? After all, it was he lost the stuart from stuka barrage.
...Surprise (attacks) ... makes each and every single hit as effective as they can,
Stop trolling already and start reading
Posts: 2358
...Oh, so you say that to a player like VonIvan? After all, it was he lost the stuart from stuka barrage.
...Surprise (attacks) ... makes each and every single hit as effective as they can,
Posts: 911
How biased and not objective are the players okw. Really? Does Scott cause sudden damage to static vehicles like a stuka? Still with that range? Answer this question pls.
Tell this to VonIvan, who lost his stuart from firing a stukas when the stuart had almost 70% health. It was in the Masters Cup. What do you say to that? Could Scott do that? Do you want me to send you this video?
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
And what is your rank? I want to know which player is telling me this. Your words do not coincide with reality
Posts: 2358
Posts: 268
that means Guards PTRSs are OP, yes?
Posts: 268
I really wonder how much does OP care about both factions if he just answers to each disagreeing person as wheraboo...
Posts: 268
Out of curiosity would you mind sharing yours?
Posts: 911
Cite where I said that the stukas is OP?
Why does OKW get powerful artillery like a walking stuka so early
Posts: 268
Bra...
Posts: 911
I did not ask for a nerf. I said this stuka should come out later.
Posts: 268
Which would be a nerf.
Posts: 911
How many contradictions. But you claimed that early stukas is a bad idea and is a risk? Or not? It turns out that this is a very big advantage. The case when a fan okw admitted himself
Posts: 2358
u too, Cite where I said that the stukas is OP?
Posts: 268
Sure, let's completely ignore the fact that early Stukas were only possible because of Spec Ops Doctrine's Command Panther. Which is getting addressed next patch. Having to tech SPHQ to get tanks will make going for early (double) Stuka(s) extremely risky.
"Faction A needs the thing because faction B has the thing" is also not a universal or even valid argument.
Wtf are you talking about? Like do you somehow think that believing (I never commented that stuka first is a bad idea, you are imagining things) that a unit is fine as is and making said unit come later are somehow contradictory statements? What you imagine I said has nothing to do with the issue your contradictions.
Posts: 911
Here is a contradiction, your friend claims that early stukas is a risk and a bad idea. Then I said transfer it to T3. You say now that this is a nerf. So can you give a definite answer? This is an advantage, and transfer to T3 will be considered a nerf, or it is not an advantage, and is a risk and not a working meta.
Posts: 54
Posts: 54
Posts: 3260
Here is a contradiction, your friend claims that early stukas is a risk and a bad idea. Then I said transfer it to T3. You say now that this is a nerf. So can you give a definite answer? This is an advantage, and transfer to T3 will be considered a nerf, or it is not an advantage, and is a risk and not a working meta.
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
What for? I don’t give advice on how to play. And I do not refer to my game. I bring arguments from the tournament. But you give me advice, tell me how powerful Scott and how problems it creates for you, but this was not visible for the entire tournament - among the most successful players. Then the words L2P are more for you.
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
powerfull and overpower. You do not distinguish such words? I did not ask for a nerf. I said this stuka should come out later. As well as other similar units. OR transfer Scott to LT or CPT.
18 | |||||
151 | |||||
17 |