Could you take a look at the AOE suppression of the Vickers. Its inability to stop blobs advancing is bit of a problem in the mid to late game, especially with vet and decreasing RA.
Please also consider looking at the wasp upgrade which has very poor performance next to the HT flamer. The UC has a harder time staying alive with its previous patch nerf which makes wasp a very risky and unattractive upgrade.
UKF September patch discussion
- This thread is locked
16 Aug 2019, 06:40 AM
#21
Posts: 98
Please bear in mind that I only play team game modes.
16 Aug 2019, 08:21 AM
#22
Posts: 42
Tested the comet and it seems to have exactly the same gun stats as before. Maybe it wasn t changed yet into the patch.
16 Aug 2019, 16:15 PM
#23
Posts: 27
Tested the comet and it seems to have exactly the same gun stats as before. Maybe it wasn t changed yet into the patch.
Did you test it in a custom game while using the September balance patch tuning pack?
It's slightly better. Not what it was at launch but it's an improvement. Comes out slower than a rushed Tiger or Pershing though.
16 Aug 2019, 16:17 PM
#24
Posts: 42
Tested in 2 custom games. One with patch, one normal. It still isn't a big threat to infantry. Actually, i couldn't really tell the diference.
And the reload bonus should be moved to vet 2.
And the reload bonus should be moved to vet 2.
16 Aug 2019, 16:27 PM
#25
Posts: 27
Tested in 2 custom games. One with patch, one normal. It still isn't a big threat to infantry. Actually, i couldn't really tell the diference.
And the reload bonus should be moved to vet 2.
It definitely still sucks against infantry until it get its WP round.
16 Aug 2019, 16:33 PM
#26
Posts: 2066
Pop cap on Churchill will do very little. How about lowering its health and keeping its armor the way it is? It is way too much of a damage sponge still. Now you have literally the same efficient churchill, with a buffed cromwell and a buffed comet on the other teching route.
Kappa
16 Aug 2019, 16:36 PM
#27
Posts: 5279
Pop cap on Churchill will do very little. How about lowering its health and keeping its armor the way it is? It is way too much of a damage sponge still. Now you have literally the same efficient churchill, with a buffed cromwell and a buffed comet on the other teching route.
You better be careful asking for big nerfs or you might end up with some pretty big ones. How well do you think it will preform with a +5 fuel cost? Hmmm? Think people will slow down building them then? What about........ +10mp. Try working THAT into your BO.
#stalinwept
16 Aug 2019, 16:41 PM
#28
Posts: 2066
You better be careful asking for big nerfs or you might end up with some pretty big ones. How well do you think it will preform with a +5 fuel cost? Hmmm? Think people will slow down building them then? What about........ +10mp. Try working THAT into your BO.
What does its performance change with a 5 fuel increase or a 2 population increase? It still has 20 million health.
Kappa
16 Aug 2019, 16:54 PM
#29
Posts: 960
Pop cap on Churchill will do very little. How about lowering its health and keeping its armor the way it is? It is way too much of a damage sponge still. Now you have literally the same efficient churchill, with a buffed cromwell and a buffed comet on the other teching route.
That, or lower its rear armor, which is currently at 180 - the same as the FRONT of the Ost Panzer 4. A while back most heavies were patched to have weaker rear armor; why not the Churchill?
Opinions reflect all team modes (not 1v1)
I often edit my posts several times after posting
I often edit my posts several times after posting
16 Aug 2019, 19:02 PM
#30
Posts: 2066
That, or lower its rear armor, which is currently at 180 - the same as the FRONT of the Ost Panzer 4. A while back most heavies were patched to have weaker rear armor; why not the Churchill?
Brits - snowflake faction with op shit ever since launch, can't nerf it all at the same time, so every year we nerf something so it keeps selling.
Kappa
16 Aug 2019, 19:51 PM
#31
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
You better be careful asking for big nerfs or you might end up with some pretty big ones. How well do you think it will preform with a +5 fuel cost? Hmmm? Think people will slow down building them then? What about........ +10mp. Try working THAT into your BO.
I'd rather have this kind of changes then mad shifts all the way from one side to the other, like crazy latinas mood relic was infamous for previously.
Goal is to bring balance, not to remove unit from any kind of consideration until next balance swing comes in, some people seem to have forgotten that.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
16 Aug 2019, 20:18 PM
#32
Posts: 5279
I'd rather have this kind of changes then mad shifts all the way from one side to the other, like crazy latinas mood relic was infamous for previously.
Goal is to bring balance, not to remove unit from any kind of consideration until next balance swing comes in, some people seem to have forgotten that.
I don't disagree about the wild changes and triple buff/nerfs but my gripe is that these hardly even count as adjustments. I mean 10mp more, no reinforcement changes? So like 40mp all game? Half a molotov research in manpower for perspective.
#stalinwept
16 Aug 2019, 20:28 PM
#33
Posts: 4474
i would prefer a dps decrease than a cost increase, volks are the cheaper squad to grab team weapons , unlike other faction they don’t have a cheaper unit to grab them
I don't disagree about the wild changes and triple buff/nerfs but my gripe is that these hardly even count as adjustments. I mean 10mp more, no reinforcement changes? So like 40mp all game? Half a molotov research in manpower for perspective.
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
16 Aug 2019, 21:29 PM
#34
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
i would prefer a dps decrease than a cost increase, volks are the cheaper squad to grab team weapons , unlike other faction they don’t have a cheaper unit to grab them
They are still a cheap squad to reinforce weapons with. Reminder that the cost increase doesn't mean a reinforce increase.
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
16 Aug 2019, 21:45 PM
#35
Posts: 783
Has anyone tested how the Comet performs now?
Is it better in AI than it used to be before.
To be honest, I still think it is chessy having the phosphorous shot with the Comet, it should be removed in trade for better AI performance instead.
Is it better in AI than it used to be before.
To be honest, I still think it is chessy having the phosphorous shot with the Comet, it should be removed in trade for better AI performance instead.
I enjoy Coh2. I want this game to be balanced as it can possibly be for
ukf
usf
okw
soviets
ostheer. Do not judge me, for my opinion is balanced. 
This is my playercard number if you are curious: https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198127033144
ukfusfokwsovietsostheer. Do not judge me, for my opinion is balanced. This is my playercard number if you are curious: https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198127033144
16 Aug 2019, 21:50 PM
#36
Posts: 54
Brits - snowflake faction with op shit ever since launch, can't nerf it all at the same time, so every year we nerf something so it keeps selling.
a faction with no moveable indirect fire (without commander) and tanks that are average = op.
Right now ukf power is in 1 unit and its IS
16 Aug 2019, 21:55 PM
#37
Posts: 4474
from the feed back I see here from certain people it’s soon gonna
They are still a cheap squad to reinforce weapons with. Reminder that the cost increase doesn't mean a reinforce increase.
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
16 Aug 2019, 22:08 PM
#38
Posts: 960
Brits - snowflake faction with op shit ever since launch, can't nerf it all at the same time, so every year we nerf something so it keeps selling.
a faction with no moveable indirect fire (without commander) and tanks that are average = op.
Right now ukf power is in 1 unit and its IS
Yea, the problem isn't that they're OP/UP, it's that their design is so hinged on critical units that it's difficult to fix via incremental patches - a similar issue that OKW/USF have, although to a lesser degree.
Take for example Infantry Sections. I think most would agree that double-bren Vet 3 IS' are extremely powerful, and might need to be toned down. The problem is; how? If they're nerfed too far, UKF is useless, since they have no other mainline infantry, and because they have no other mainline infantry, they still need to scale from 0 to end. In general, UKF/USF/OKW need a rework that adds redundant, but weaker units, so that they're more inline with Ost/Sov, rather than having units that need to scale from minute 0 to the end of time. I.e. something line grens -> pgrens, Cons -> Penals, or Zis-3 -> Su76 -> SU85.
That, and they're just missing critical tools that vanilla factions have; Snipers, proper ATGs, mortars, etc.
Opinions reflect all team modes (not 1v1)
I often edit my posts several times after posting
I often edit my posts several times after posting
17 Aug 2019, 07:37 AM
#39
Posts: 2066
a faction with no moveable indirect fire (without commander) and tanks that are average = op.
Right now ukf power is in 1 unit and its IS
Yes, it was op throughout most of its lifecycle, but like I said and you didn't understand, they nerfed one op thing at a time, as it was the last major dlc and had to sell. And now that we have one unit left that is too good, we can finally get around to actually balancing the faction
Kappa
17 Aug 2019, 08:50 AM
#40
Posts: 955
I like the core of these changes
Finally we can go back to one piece of each builds, instead of 4 IS every gameukfukf
Finally we can go back to one piece of each builds, instead of 4 IS every game
ukfukf
"Nice. Very impressive. Now let´s see Paul Allen´s playercard."
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
69 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
295 | ||
 |
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
20 | ||
|
|
|
|
19 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.611220.735+5
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.918405.694+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1236
Board Info
723 users are online:
723 guests
0 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49122
Welcome our newest member, Harda621
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Harda621
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM