Umm, everything about preview KT IS better.
Better damage, better health pool/armor, better penetration.
It simply doesn't deserve to be any better vs infantry then other heavies, because there is no balance reason for it.
And not sure what anything about KT should be faster, when it was heaviest and slowest tank of the war.
Individually, it couldn't even engage IS-2 without any problems, so it hardly was superior at all if you want to move on historical background.
KT was not the slowest vehicle in the war.
It was designed with the better equipment than the predecessor the Tiger (1).
The engine of the KT is better but the overall weight of tank is what made it somewhat slower but the KT could go 41kmh while the Tiger (1) 45kmh.
Not much of a difference in speed you see.
Optics were superior, designs, armour, equipment, technology. Just simply a huge upgrade overall.
For a super heavy tank. Surely that was really fast, even faster than some Sherman variants.
Turret turn rate of KT was better than the Tiger (1). It depended on the usage of energy used by the tank. King Tiger turn rate was faster than the Tiger 1 which is pretty amazing when you think about it.
Despite it being bigger the KT, the turret turn rate was definitely faster and better.
KT current turn rate in game is like being traversed by hand which is pretty much a joke to what it actually was in reality. It did not run out fuel in game, did it?
Bigger gun is deadlier but slower reload (which Coh2 got right with the reload). It was still reasonably fast for a big gun like that.
What it should have been in game:
Speed similar to Tiger 1 but slightly slower but in game its drastically slower (which is a false statistic).
Turrent turn rate should be the same for the sake of balancing otherwise it should be faster than Tiger.