1 it has more armor 2 it deals ton of damage, so no it's anti inf just cause it supresses them it does not make it not anti inf
1. this doesnt make sense... its going to die to AT guns just as quickly as the flametruck
2. it deals alot less damage than the flametruck does... granted it does suppression
a the pw wefer the unit that only has 160 range and has lower aoe and is an hit or miss , while the katy can fire from 200 range and can saturate and area leaving no chance to get away with 1 or 2 models , either u instant retreat or they are dead
Irrelevant... all rocket arty is fired at minimum range lest they have almost no effect
and no the pwerfer wipes much much better than the katy does... at any range
pwefer is not bad but why rant about it ? i didn't say anything about it
because you wanted a katy-pwerfer comparison... im sorry but the Pwerfer is better
Saying kt is long range anti inf and the p4 and not listing the t 34 76 is pure bias, why do count basic medium as anti inf but not the t 34 76 ?
the T-34-76 is made of swiss cheese having less HP than the average medium and dies to a sneeze from 2 AT guns... a P4 or a sherman would easily be able to escape death that would fall upon a T-34-76
and lastly this is coming from the faction with THE worst core infantry and machinegun ingame...
just to note however...
the soviets may have the squishiest and probably the least potent core vehicle AI....
but the soviet doctrinal vehicle AI are some of the scariest ones ingame....
ISU-152
IS-2
T-34-85
KV-8
even the KV-1
hence the soviets... even in their vehicles continue to suffer from the "doctrines for viability syndrome".... this has to end... people dont want to be stuck playing guards motor combined arms or armored assault to make up for the lack of good vehicle AI...
TLDR; make core soviet viable...