Jackson needs some more buffs

Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 11:22 AMStug life

like ukf ? i don't remember them getting 2 td

Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 11:45 AMSkysTheLimit

Closest thing US has after Jackson is Stuart

Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 09:13 AMSeductiveCardbordBox

All the TDs?

The M10 is mobile. The Firefly has a turret and enough mobility and tulips. Honourable mentiones to the Puma and Panther as mobile vehicle hunters, if not proper TDs.

The vulnerable to rushes part is purely for fixed casemate TDs like the SU85 and JgPz IV and StuG.

What they are all actually vulnerable to is infantry, for which they have zero response. And the jackson is as weak there as any other TD.

Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 11:45 AMSkysTheLimit

He said AT units not TDs. Comet, AEC both qualify

Closest thing US has after Jackson is Stuart

Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 12:58 PMStug life

so is tiger qualified ?

Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 12:58 PMKatitof

Is Tiger stock?

Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 13:00 PMStug life

yea point taken but comet is a generalist with high pen not an at platform

Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 13:05 PMKatitof

Go back a few posts, wording is bad, but context fits the argument.

Jump back to quoted post1 Aug 2019, 21:43 PMSkysTheLimit

It also did 240 dmg back then, and could 3 shot medium tanks which it had no trouble penetrating

That's also not the reason for the moving acc multiplier. A) a the various Shermans have it too, it's a USF thing not the Jackson.

B) heavy tanks have massive target sizes so they're hard to miss, the moving accuracy had little to do with that

Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 13:14 PMStug life

MOBILE DEDICATED AT UNIT

wording is not bad he said dedicated and anyway zook exist

Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 15:21 PMEsxile

I would have worded differently if Sherman at shells were reliable to pen anything heavier than the ostwind. If you look it faction wise, Jackson may be your only at source the player get until he backtrack T2 to get unreliable atgun on which you must spend munition on top of that to pen a okw pz4

Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 15:26 PMCODGUY

If anything the Jackson needs a slight health buff otherwise it's fine the way it is. Like you said it's your only really good AT weapon most of the time as USF. The days where the Jackson had barely any health were pathetic. You could blitz the Jackson with an Ostwind and come out on top it was sad.

Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 16:09 PMLoopDloop

Wtf jackson does not need more health lul.

Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 16:09 PMLoopDloop

Wtf jackson does not need more health lul.

Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 17:41 PMCODGUY

I mean it doesn't have to have a buff but it would help make it less vulnerable to stuff like double schreks and AT guns, as it is those things easily defeat a Jackson.

Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 12:38 PMdistrofio

yeah like, closest thing OH has after stugIII is teller mine. Absolutly unrelated comparison.

Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 13:00 PMStug life

yea point taken but comet is a generalist with high pen not an at platform

Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 18:20 PMStug life

well duh at gun defeat tank who would expect that, what should it be invulenrable to those

Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 18:47 PMCODGUY

So you know Axis factions have ways to easily defeat a Jackson, why the hell are we arguing for nerfs then?

Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2019, 13:47 PMAlphrum

what are u on about, your purposely missing the point. Even if Jackson had no trouble missing heavies its all pointless if they couldn't pen it from the front, which is why they had 0.75 acc to encourage flanking however, against decent players this was difficult to rely on.