Login

russian armor

Suggestion: penals immune to suppression

17 Oct 2013, 18:46 PM
#61
avatar of =][=mmortal

Posts: 215

Penals arent used because they dont serve a purpose, not because their stats are terrible (although they do seem weak). No AT, no doctrinal cheese abilities like HTD, no molotovs.... why ever use this unit?
18 Oct 2013, 10:15 AM
#62
avatar of UGBEAR

Posts: 954

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Oct 2013, 02:37 AMlink0


That would be ridiculously OP. About 2x the dps of grens, and 50% more HP for only slightly more MP? For 360mp, sure (that would be just a change of armor to 1.5).

I would also support a straight MP reduction to 280mp with no other changes.


360MP and 25MP reinforce, Or 360MP 30MP reinforce but armor rise from 1.0 to 1.5,

but as everyone know the problem of soviet teching, T1 and T2 are just mutually

exclusive for their high cost, without T2 ZIS-3 support, soviet going to have a harsh time fight those fantasy German armor
18 Oct 2013, 11:42 AM
#63
avatar of SgtBulldog

Posts: 688

Despite the suffering of the penals in its current state, I cannot support this suggestion.

No infantry unit should be immune to suppression. It just doesn't make sense.
18 Oct 2013, 13:03 PM
#64
avatar of Tivook

Posts: 89

Despite the suffering of the penals in its current state, I cannot support this suggestion.

No infantry unit should be immune to suppression. It just doesn't make sense.


If you think about it for a while you should come to the conclusion that it wouldn't be so extremely unbalanced as people tend to think.

Why? Well first of all, standing infantry takes incredible damage from mgs. Rushing straight forward into an mg would result in severe damage to the unit.

Second, all units should have a counter unit, I don't see why the penal squad couldn't be balanced in such a way that it could become the hard counter to mgs from the The Special Rifle Command building.
18 Oct 2013, 15:04 PM
#65
avatar of MetaStable14

Posts: 95

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Oct 2013, 13:03 PMTivook


If you think about it for a while you should come to the conclusion that it wouldn't be so extremely unbalanced as people tend to think.

Why? Well first of all, standing infantry takes incredible damage from mgs. Rushing straight forward into an mg would result in severe damage to the unit.

Second, all units should have a counter unit, I don't see why the penal squad couldn't be balanced in such a way that it could become the hard counter to mgs from the The Special Rifle Command building.


Flanking is the hard counter to the mg42. Why do you feel that you need a mindless no skill unit that can take out an mg42?

If the reinforcement cost were reduced a bit I really think they would be fine.
18 Oct 2013, 18:02 PM
#66
avatar of Tivook

Posts: 89



Flanking is the hard counter to the mg42. Why do you feel that you need a mindless no skill unit that can take out an mg42?

If the reinforcement cost were reduced a bit I really think they would be fine.


I can think of a plethora of maps where you can position a german MG in such a way that it's impossible to flank it. I'm sure you can too. Nuff said.
18 Oct 2013, 19:16 PM
#67
avatar of Nullist

Posts: 2425

Permanently Banned
"Hi! I am Penis Battalion! Ima stand erect in your MG arc and shoot you in the face with G43/LMG DPS! U mad?"

No, I dont think so.
18 Oct 2013, 19:47 PM
#68
avatar of Tivook

Posts: 89

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Oct 2013, 19:16 PMNullist
"Hi! I am Penis Battalion! Ima stand erect in your MG arc and shoot you in the face with G43/LMG DPS! U mad?"

No, I dont think so.


Suffering from reading disability? Don't reply to my posts. Third time I remind you of this.

Also:

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Oct 2013, 13:03 PMTivook

I don't see why the penal squad couldn't be balanced in such a way that it could become the hard counter to mgs from the The Special Rifle Command building.


Plus: The fact that during the war, running straight into a german mg is often what soviet soldiers had to do. There was no retreat option.
18 Oct 2013, 20:21 PM
#69
avatar of Nullist

Posts: 2425

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post18 Oct 2013, 19:47 PMTivook
Suffering from reading disability? Don't reply to my posts. Third time I remind you of this.


Was my post addressed to you? Nope.
Notice the the title and topic of the thread?
Reading disability right there.

If I ever talk to you, Ill address you. I havent, so quit this bullshit.
18 Oct 2013, 20:31 PM
#70
avatar of undostrescuatro

Posts: 525

jump backJump back to quoted post18 Oct 2013, 19:16 PMNullist
"Hi! I am Penile Battalion! Ima stand erect in your MG arc and shoot you in the face with G43/LMG DPS! U mad?"

No, I dont think so.


corrected

on a side note. i would give them the ability to simple not duck for cover, make the penile batallions not dance for anything. mortar rounds falling? we dont duck for cover. grenade? what is duck? tank shooting? lol try to hit me. they should only duck for suppresion.

does it reflect that i hate those units dancing around?
18 Oct 2013, 22:51 PM
#71
avatar of tokarev

Posts: 307

jump backJump back to quoted post16 Oct 2013, 10:56 AMNullist
Why? Are Penals supposed to counter MG42s or something?



Actually, the situation is currently the exact opposite.
Penals own the everloving hell out of Grens.
I dont understand how you can say something that is so utterly contradictory to the actual facts of these units stats.

Key: Near / Medium / Far
Penals: 34.674 / 21.816 / 8.952
Grens: 15.1 / 9.608 / 4.116

Thats more than twice the DPS on Penals that have the same survival coefficient as Grens.

Maybe you can show me a replay in which Grens "kill penals really good"?

I dont understand how someone can claim what you did, with a straight face, as if there was any objective factual basis for it, whatsoever. Blows my mind, completely...

As to Penal improvement: Reduce MP cost and swap Flamer for PTSR upgrade to diversify and enable non-Commander Sov early AT. It would be a "poor man's shrek", on a unit with otherwise good ranged DPS, and doesnt step on Guards, since Guard have 1.5 armor, upgradeable Button, but worse DPS.


Hey Nully, could you provide us with link where you get this stats on damage? Thanks.
18 Oct 2013, 23:19 PM
#72
avatar of Nullist

Posts: 2425

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post18 Oct 2013, 22:51 PMtokarev


Hey Nully, could you provide us with link where you get this stats on damage? Thanks.


https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ApmrrrPr20ncdEpuSHcxNko1VGVFYjczYXpFZWhqOHc#gid=0

Wish I could credit who's made them. All I know is Wooof.
19 Oct 2013, 23:14 PM
#73
avatar of SgtBulldog

Posts: 688



Flanking is the hard counter to the mg42. Why do you feel that you need a mindless no skill unit that can take out an mg42?


If it doesn't take suppression, it'll stay in the line of fire and die.

Do you have any problem sacrificing a 240 MP unit to kill a 360?

I'd take that trade any day.
19 Oct 2013, 23:16 PM
#74
avatar of Nullist

Posts: 2425

Permanently Banned


If it doesn't take suppression, it'll stay in the line of fire and die.

Do you have any problem sacrificing a 240 MP unit to kill a 360?

I'd take that trade any day.


The fuck does this post even mean.

Seriously. Ive read it 5 times. Still makes no fking sense.
19 Oct 2013, 23:19 PM
#75
avatar of c r u C e

Posts: 525



If it doesn't take suppression, it'll stay in the line of fire and die.

Do you have any problem sacrificing a 240 MP unit to kill a 360?

I'd take that trade any day.


Uhm,what?
20 Oct 2013, 17:19 PM
#76
avatar of Turtle

Posts: 401

He's trying to make the argument that being unsuppressable means they will stay the firing arc of an MG for longer, thus taking more damage.

Which is a silly argument.

The whole point of being unsuppressable is to be able to move to get around MGs and out of its line of fire. Any decent player will run all over the place dodging MGs and blowing stuff up.

No infantry, ever, should be immune to suppression. I'd even go so far to say that suppression resistance should not be a thing either unless there's some really, really, really good reason or penalty associated with it (such as extra damage from MGs).

Which might be an interesting way to do things. A small suppression resistance for drastically increased MG damage to Penals. But that would still require a drastic overhaul of that part of the balance scheme anyway.
22 Oct 2013, 08:15 AM
#77
avatar of SgtBulldog

Posts: 688

It's not silly. It's a fact. And one that's been mentioned previously in the threads by others.

Which some of you would have known, had you read before you posted...
22 Oct 2013, 08:29 AM
#78
avatar of Nullist

Posts: 2425

Permanently Banned
It's not silly. It's a fact. And one that's been mentioned previously in the threads by others. Which some of you would have known, had you read before you posted...
Sorry, what "fact" are you referring to specifically?

Are you trying to state that Penals where unsuppressable by HMGs, as historical fact?
22 Oct 2013, 10:33 AM
#79
avatar of karolus10

Posts: 45

I think that penal squads could get conscripts "Urah !", this unit even fits more for this ability than conscripts.

I like idea with suppression mitigation for penal squads but in bit other way ;) !

I think that "Urah !" should cancel suppression during ability duration but also seriously multiply damage received from suppression weapons, so it would be more like charging on German AA quad in CoH 1 rather than trolling MG's and running through firing arc without scratch.

This way "Urah" charge would be high risk (You can get your squad chopped down entirely), high gain tactic.

EDIT_1: Of course, still, no "Urah !" if suppressed already :).
22 Oct 2013, 12:58 PM
#80
avatar of ThumbsUp

Posts: 182

I love penal squads, but in a 1vs1 they don't fill a roll or come out in a reasonable amount of time. Mass conscripts is a lot more effetive. I've really tried incorporating them into some sort of strat with tier 1 but due to their survivability and current abilities (and considering the current german meta usually involves quick light vehicles) they just become a manpower drain. They have potential but it definitely hasn't been reached.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

New Zealand 55
Russian Federation 28
unknown 5
unknown 1
Germany 1

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

355 users are online: 1 member and 354 guests
RiddhiSiddhi
1 post in the last 24h
16 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
Registered members: 48909
Welcome our newest member, rudyegill
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM