Cavalry Riflemen to T0
Posts: 888
Posts: 3053
Posts: 20
OKW get Panzerfuzies T0, why can't these also be an opening option?!
Posts: 3260
Agreed!
OKW get Panzerfuzies T0, why can't these also be an opening option?!
They probably could be in an doctrine that doesn't have the WC51 in it. Before they get their Thompsons they're about on the level of Assault Engineers.
However, T0 Cav Rifles in a T0 WC-51 would allow USF to drive their opponent off the board in the first couple of minutes. I'd wager that's why Cav Rifles are T1 in the first place.
...and AT satchel should be 30 munitions. It would just be nice to have a starting unit as USF that isn't complete garbage you know.
They do, they're called Riflemen.
Posts: 4474
Agreed!well if u make them come with rear echelon rifles that they then have to upgrade im ok, i mean panzerfusilier comes with a worse rifle than volks while costing 30 more mp
OKW get Panzerfuzies T0, why can't these also be an opening option?!
Posts: 5279
They do, they're called Riflemen.
If USF started with 210mp paratroopers starting vetted and with the lmgs the op would be complaining that pios are 200mp and are actually super shock troops so I wouldn't fuss too much on this one...
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
Posts: 4474
Why would the AT satchel be cheaper than the penal version. What possible reason could there be for thatAmerica fuck yeaamisusf
probably this is how codguy plays https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHbWnj7w__0
Posts: 2358
Cav riflemen should be T0 and should be buffed to ride on actual horses, since they are called 'Cavalry' riflemen, duh!
Posts: 4474
Yeah, riflemen are utter trash and the whole USF faction is but the worst of all /si think he was thinking about double zook rifle and double piat RE
Cav riflemen should be T0 and should be buffed to ride on actual horses, since they are called 'Cavalry' riflemen, duh!
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Posts: 785
Posts: 810
Posts: 563
Posts: 728
It would be nice if i didnt have to delay by making a mortar etc so i can stall to call in 2 cav rifle squads
Posts: 888
Cav rifles i dont think would be a problem at t0 if you make thompson upgrade cp required and give them a build time maybe.They are not that dangerous in the dodge with out the thompsons unless your opponent is a moron, grens have snares, okw t0 rak, 90 percent axis call in inf has snares, if you get rolled by t0 cav rifles in a dodge you prolly suck. Mostly fusilers just shouldnt be t0. People defend it by saying their rifles worse then volks blah blah but they have no build time become super blobable early where there sheer numbers make up for it, awesome when in cover defending hard to assault.
It would be nice if i didnt have to delay by making a mortar etc so i can stall to call in 2 cav rifle squads
I'd say just tie the Thommpsons to teching to LT or CPT. Although they're is no teching required for four StG44s on Strums but whatever that would be a fair enough compromise.
Livestreams
4 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.35157.860+16
- 4.599234.719+7
- 5.934410.695-1
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
12 posts in the last week
24 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Dingle83
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM