Login

russian armor

Ostwind's penetrations

PAGES (15)down
27 Jun 2019, 00:11 AM
#221
avatar of Farlion

Posts: 379 | Subs: 1

The Ostwind is fine as it. The only complaints are from Allied players who can’t deal with the horror of Wehrmacht finally having a window where it can be a proactive, not reactive faction.

27 Jun 2019, 03:02 AM
#222
avatar of IncendiaryRounds:)

Posts: 1527

Permanently Banned
Yes, make the centaur 90 fuel. Case closed. Original poster thinks that 2 Ostwinds should be able to punish an already low health T34??? LOL. Even the Centaur does damage to mediums with each burst.
27 Jun 2019, 09:18 AM
#223
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474

how did this become from nerf ostwind to buff centaur ? i mean buffing centaur does nothing to USF and soviet
27 Jun 2019, 09:42 AM
#224
avatar of SupremeStefan

Posts: 1220

27 Jun 2019, 10:07 AM
#225
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

Just make it 100 fuel and we gut

^ If its as good as centaur, no need for it to cost less then centaur.

(inb4 muh armur - ost more then makes up for that in speed)
27 Jun 2019, 11:20 AM
#226
avatar of Kirrik

Posts: 573

It has become "buff Centaur" which has nothing to do with Ostwind in first place thanks to wehraboo circlejerk who derailed the point of this topic in every possible way. All this Centraur rubbish is just classic whataboutism.

Increasing cost of Ostwind is the absolute least that should be done to it.

Skipping T1/T2 with new commander to rush it is also shouldnt be a thing, schreks should be locked behind T2
27 Jun 2019, 13:22 PM
#227
avatar of ShadowLinkX37
Director of Moderation Badge

Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4



Can we throw in like a 10F increase to the ostwind in there?
27 Jun 2019, 13:31 PM
#228
avatar of Sander93

Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6

Can we throw in like a 10F increase to the ostwind in there?


It's scheduled for a minor price increase to 300MP and 100FU to better reflect its new performance.
27 Jun 2019, 14:31 PM
#229
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474

fair
28 Jun 2019, 09:15 AM
#230
avatar of DerKuhlmann

Posts: 469

OstWin just shows allies actually have to have a balanced army and if not they get punished.

Just like Ostheer has for years?
28 Jun 2019, 19:01 PM
#231
avatar of MakiesKurisu

Posts: 130

OstWin just shows allies actually have to have a balanced army and if not they get punished.

Just like Ostheer has for years?


It comes faster than centaur and more deadly against inf. 1 ATG won't stop ostwind, 2 are costy and won't work if it got panzer tactic that could drop smoke, let alone ATGs are short at mobility. Ostwinds can bleed allies hard on manpower. either lower its damage slightly below centaur or nerf its range by 5 would make sense.
29 Jun 2019, 03:10 AM
#232
avatar of IncendiaryRounds:)

Posts: 1527

Permanently Banned


It comes faster than centaur and more deadly against inf. 1 ATG won't stop ostwind, 2 are costy and won't work if it got panzer tactic that could drop smoke, let alone ATGs are short at mobility. Ostwinds can bleed allies hard on manpower. either lower its damage slightly below centaur or nerf its range by 5 would make sense.


Actually a single at gun isn't able to stop T70 either. It all depends on positioning.
29 Jun 2019, 03:48 AM
#233
avatar of distrofio

Posts: 2358

This is by far the most troll thread in a while. Just close it, since everyone that discussed politely has agreed that Ostwinds could use a slight price nerf. Period.

As far as i am concerned it was both, the new T2 skip + Ostind buff the responsible for the new shock value Ost has. It is not a wise solution to nerf its stats since it does not overperform any of their counterparts in the same time frame. In other words 1 T34 > 1 Ostwind.
2 Jul 2019, 16:47 PM
#234
avatar of MakiesKurisu

Posts: 130



Actually a single at gun isn't able to stop T70 either. It all depends on positioning.

It's not exactly the same. A single AT can not kill a T-70 but can prevent its aggressive movement in some certain area well. But Ostwind can deal a lot damage from distance, meaning that even u have a AT in front of the Ostwind, it can still bleed u hard. And the biggest difference between them maybe when counter AT infs. PGs or Fusilers with 2 shercks can defend them from T-70s while Guards or bazooka teams are wiped out quickly by Ostwind.
Nerfing it's range or far aquracy is reasonable.
2 Jul 2019, 16:58 PM
#235
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474


It's not exactly the same. A single AT can not kill a T-70 but can prevent its aggressive movement in some certain area well. But Ostwind can deal a lot damage from distance, meaning that even u have a AT in front of the Ostwind, it can still bleed u hard. And the biggest difference between them maybe when counter AT infs. PGs or Fusilers with 2 shercks can defend them from T-70s while Guards or bazooka teams are wiped out quickly by Ostwind.
Nerfing it's range or far aquracy is reasonable.
??? u know ostwind has 110 armor right ? zook destroys it if u have enough
3 Jul 2019, 17:27 PM
#236
avatar of MakiesKurisu

Posts: 130

??? u know ostwind has 110 armor right ? zook destroys it if u have enough

their range are almost the same and ostwind wipe out infs quickly at max range. A shecks team can defend themselves against a T-70 while even 2 zook teams will be not enough to hold the line against ostwind in open battle. Of course u could kill it with 8 zooks or more. But that's costy and leaving u got little AI firepowers. The problem is the range not the armor.
3 Jul 2019, 17:30 PM
#237
avatar of MakiesKurisu

Posts: 130

Ostwind should take some risk when attacking AT infs
3 Jul 2019, 18:25 PM
#238
avatar of Vuther
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1


their range are almost the same and ostwind wipe out infs quickly at max range. A shecks team can defend themselves against a T-70 while even 2 zook teams will be not enough to hold the line against ostwind in open battle. Of course u could kill it with 8 zooks or more. But that's costy and leaving u got little AI firepowers. The problem is the range not the armor.

I dunno, both of them have the same range. T-70 will take longer to entirely fight off a bunch of AT infantry running at it due to its cheaper cost and correspondingly weaker damage, but both of them are basically going to inflict free manpower bleed when micromanaged effectively because they outrun and outrange handheld AT without much trouble.
13 Jul 2019, 16:44 PM
#239
avatar of MakiesKurisu

Posts: 130

jump backJump back to quoted post3 Jul 2019, 18:25 PMVuther

I dunno, both of them have the same range. T-70 will take longer to entirely fight off a bunch of AT infantry running at it due to its cheaper cost and correspondingly weaker damage, but both of them are basically going to inflict free manpower bleed when micromanaged effectively because they outrun and outrange handheld AT without much trouble.

Ostwinds need much less micros to keep the distance. I most circumstances, all u have to do is right clicking on AT infs and it can wipe them out with huge DPS and Allies' AT infs got less DPH relying on continous firing.
13 Jul 2019, 17:19 PM
#240
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474


Ostwinds need much less micros to keep the distance. I most circumstances, all u have to do is right clicking on AT infs and it can wipe them out with huge DPS and Allies' AT infs got less DPH relying on continous firing.
why ? is it faster ? they have the same range
PAGES (15)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

696 users are online: 696 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49098
Welcome our newest member, Coh2_Relaxed
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM