Ostwind's penetrations
Posts: 379 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1527
Permanently BannedPosts: 4474
Posts: 1220
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Just make it 100 fuel and we gut
^ If its as good as centaur, no need for it to cost less then centaur.
(inb4 muh armur - ost more then makes up for that in speed)
Posts: 573
Increasing cost of Ostwind is the absolute least that should be done to it.
Skipping T1/T2 with new commander to rush it is also shouldnt be a thing, schreks should be locked behind T2
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Can we throw in like a 10F increase to the ostwind in there?
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
Can we throw in like a 10F increase to the ostwind in there?
It's scheduled for a minor price increase to 300MP and 100FU to better reflect its new performance.
Posts: 4474
Posts: 469
Just like Ostheer has for years?
Posts: 130
OstWin just shows allies actually have to have a balanced army and if not they get punished.
Just like Ostheer has for years?
It comes faster than centaur and more deadly against inf. 1 ATG won't stop ostwind, 2 are costy and won't work if it got panzer tactic that could drop smoke, let alone ATGs are short at mobility. Ostwinds can bleed allies hard on manpower. either lower its damage slightly below centaur or nerf its range by 5 would make sense.
Posts: 1527
Permanently Banned
It comes faster than centaur and more deadly against inf. 1 ATG won't stop ostwind, 2 are costy and won't work if it got panzer tactic that could drop smoke, let alone ATGs are short at mobility. Ostwinds can bleed allies hard on manpower. either lower its damage slightly below centaur or nerf its range by 5 would make sense.
Actually a single at gun isn't able to stop T70 either. It all depends on positioning.
Posts: 2358
As far as i am concerned it was both, the new T2 skip + Ostind buff the responsible for the new shock value Ost has. It is not a wise solution to nerf its stats since it does not overperform any of their counterparts in the same time frame. In other words 1 T34 > 1 Ostwind.
Posts: 130
Actually a single at gun isn't able to stop T70 either. It all depends on positioning.
It's not exactly the same. A single AT can not kill a T-70 but can prevent its aggressive movement in some certain area well. But Ostwind can deal a lot damage from distance, meaning that even u have a AT in front of the Ostwind, it can still bleed u hard. And the biggest difference between them maybe when counter AT infs. PGs or Fusilers with 2 shercks can defend them from T-70s while Guards or bazooka teams are wiped out quickly by Ostwind.
Nerfing it's range or far aquracy is reasonable.
Posts: 4474
??? u know ostwind has 110 armor right ? zook destroys it if u have enough
It's not exactly the same. A single AT can not kill a T-70 but can prevent its aggressive movement in some certain area well. But Ostwind can deal a lot damage from distance, meaning that even u have a AT in front of the Ostwind, it can still bleed u hard. And the biggest difference between them maybe when counter AT infs. PGs or Fusilers with 2 shercks can defend them from T-70s while Guards or bazooka teams are wiped out quickly by Ostwind.
Nerfing it's range or far aquracy is reasonable.
Posts: 130
??? u know ostwind has 110 armor right ? zook destroys it if u have enough
their range are almost the same and ostwind wipe out infs quickly at max range. A shecks team can defend themselves against a T-70 while even 2 zook teams will be not enough to hold the line against ostwind in open battle. Of course u could kill it with 8 zooks or more. But that's costy and leaving u got little AI firepowers. The problem is the range not the armor.
Posts: 130
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
their range are almost the same and ostwind wipe out infs quickly at max range. A shecks team can defend themselves against a T-70 while even 2 zook teams will be not enough to hold the line against ostwind in open battle. Of course u could kill it with 8 zooks or more. But that's costy and leaving u got little AI firepowers. The problem is the range not the armor.
I dunno, both of them have the same range. T-70 will take longer to entirely fight off a bunch of AT infantry running at it due to its cheaper cost and correspondingly weaker damage, but both of them are basically going to inflict free manpower bleed when micromanaged effectively because they outrun and outrange handheld AT without much trouble.
Posts: 130
I dunno, both of them have the same range. T-70 will take longer to entirely fight off a bunch of AT infantry running at it due to its cheaper cost and correspondingly weaker damage, but both of them are basically going to inflict free manpower bleed when micromanaged effectively because they outrun and outrange handheld AT without much trouble.
Ostwinds need much less micros to keep the distance. I most circumstances, all u have to do is right clicking on AT infs and it can wipe them out with huge DPS and Allies' AT infs got less DPH relying on continous firing.
Posts: 4474
why ? is it faster ? they have the same range
Ostwinds need much less micros to keep the distance. I most circumstances, all u have to do is right clicking on AT infs and it can wipe them out with huge DPS and Allies' AT infs got less DPH relying on continous firing.
Livestreams
51 | |||||
45 | |||||
38 | |||||
37 | |||||
24 | |||||
9 | |||||
311 | |||||
19 | |||||
5 | |||||
3 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.35057.860+15
- 3.1110614.644+11
- 4.643231.736+3
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.921406.694-1
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.17246.789+2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
3 posts in the last week
35 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Kampho72
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM