Posts: 857 | Subs: 2
The suggestion is to lower its AI and increase it anti LV increasing utility.
One could even add a different firing mod for that balancing the 2 fire mod separately.
The current performance of Ostwind vs moving light vehicles is rather poor.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Can only speak for myself but i want the Ostwind to be strong against infantry. Thats why i like the changes in the patch so far.
Posts: 1392
Posts: 10
8 pop pgrens, now they will replace mainlines like penal... Just better
Shrek spam here we come
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
If the only thing that it bring to the table is AI it has to be very very effective at that role making it frustrating to play with and against it.
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
+1，and I think PG default weapon change to 98k or MP40，STG44 upgrade need phase 2 but give more buff for PG
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Posts: 783
The bare minimum:
Increase the rear armor of the PvIV H (and PzIV J). The is no reason for these unit to have less rear armor than the Ostheer PzIV.
ukf
usf
okw
soviets
ostheer. Do not judge me, for my opinion is balanced. 
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
The bare minimum:
Increase the rear armor of the PvIV H (and PzIV J). The is no reason for these unit to have less rear armor than the Ostheer PzIV.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Already fixed just wasn't in the official notes.
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Why do you assume it's a ninja change? There are hundreds of changes in the new patch notes, it was just forgotten about. It will be in the official notes once the patch goes live.
 |
|
|
81 | ||
 |
|
|
30 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
38 | ||
|
|
|
|
31 | ||
|
|
|
|
13 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
