Cav Rifles
Posts: 3260
The counter to short-range infantry is, in almost all cases, vehicles. If they get in close they'll outgun your infantry, so you use a light vehicle to drive them back.
To faciliate this, almost every CQC unit in the game has no snare. The exception is Cavalry Riflemen, which get AT satchels.
Is that compensated for by their Riflemen-level durability, or is strong CQC power and the power to zone their traditional counter (demanding the constant attention of the opponent to micro the LV away from them) too much?
I don't know myself.
Posts: 206
I know that WC51 + Cav Rifleman is very strong, if not OP. But CavRifleman alone itself is very fragile and bleed very much.
And cmon, satchel range is very low, you have to be BrainAFk to let they close in and throw it
Posts: 3260
Light vehicles are not the only counter to CQC infantry, there are Mgs, mines, anti infantry units and etc.
I know that WC51 + Cav Rifleman is very strong, if not OP. But CavRifleman alone itself is very fragile and bleed very much.
And cmon, satchel range is very low, you have to be BrainAFk to let they close in and throw it
If you're microing the LV, sure.
But all the time you're microing the LV away from the Cav Rifles, it needs your constant attention.
Against Shocks, you're safe looking away to issue some orders to another engagement.
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
Posts: 3032 | Subs: 3
But then it might be too OP with the smoke nades on the other hand, they could just single-handedly take out an OKW schwerer Panzer HQ or a bunker
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
I think a large problem with cavs is that BAR rifles just kinda do everything. They're CQC oriented, but also perform very well at max range. Doesn't really leave room for much else when you can just buy more rifles. On top of that 2 thompsons and 3 grease guns are pretty underwhelming in comparison to 2x BARs or rangers/paras 4x thompsons. Yeah they're cheesey as hell in the WC51, but I think that's more of a truck issue than anything.
You can get 2 Thompson and 1 BARs on Cav Riflemen and their mid DPS is quite good.
Posts: 1527
Permanently BannedPosts: 2458 | Subs: 1
Cav Rifles would be good enough even without the satchel. Just as the WC51 is good enough(actually too good) without the mark target and call in arty.
Posts: 206
Would it be ok to have a satchel on agrens? I'd like to hear the excuses.
Ass grens is 0 CP and have sprint and infiltration nades, it's a totally different unit
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Would it be ok to have a satchel on agrens? I'd like to hear the excuses.
Sure, you just have to give up 6th man, nades and sprint.
Deal?
Posts: 5279
Posts: 1527
Permanently Banned
Sure, you just have to give up 6th man, nades and sprint.
Deal?
Agrens would only have to give up ONE of those abilities since losing satchel doesn't impact AI performance of cav rifle. Meanwhile Cav rifles also have 3 abilities" thompson, smoke and satchel. thompson = 6th man since thompson cav rifles basically hardcounter 5man agrens.
Posts: 1527
Permanently BannedLivestreams
49 | |||||
35 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.620222.736+5
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.918405.694+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, igryskoj24
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM