OST Grens
Posts: 783
Pzgrens needs to die less often for that cost. Currently drops faster than Obers which is ridiculous. Also, Lacks utility. For the way it is, it should be 300-320 manpower. 300 manpower I would say personally for the way it currently is.
OR
Buff them a little
Read also what WingZero said https://www.coh2.org/topic/88920/i-hear-the-new-patches-have-made-western-allies-op/post/737468
This will solve the issues Wehrmacht has.
Also fix Ostwind. That is self-explanatory!
Posts: 600
OR... Make the Squad leader upgrade a stock upgrade. So they pay 60 munis for either a LMG42 (and stay 4man), or a 5th man and G43's.
When you think the USf and UKF get 2x LMG's per squad and 5 man squads, its not unreasonable. |
I mean, theres a lot of arguments in here like "Penals are the counterpart to P-Grens". But... think about it, the squad wipe potential is vastly different to output...
One mine = half a OST squad dead, = retreat.
2 snipers, and you have to run.
1 mortar shell or nade can easily wipe a squad...
Late game, a dozer sherman/HE round sherman, Scott, Pakhowitzer, Brit Centaur or even a IS2 can easily AND QUICKLY 1 shot a vet 3 gren squad....
As for a 5-6 man squad that aint gonna happen unless they position clump.
If you compensated cost for the 5th man of a gren squad, it would be fine. The only reason anyone would oppose that is either they dont play the game, or they're enjoying their allied win spree. (which trust me, ive done before, im not proud of it, was to prove a point).
Posts: 783
I mean, all it needs is grens to have a 5-man squad, and cost 280. Gives them a new dynamic that also prevent them from being too easily wiped mid-late game.
OR... Make the Squad leader upgrade a stock upgrade. So they pay 60 munis for either a LMG42 (and stay 4man), or a 5th man and G43's.
When you think the USf and UKF get 2x LMG's per squad and 5 man squads, its not unreasonable. |
I mean, theres a lot of arguments in here like "Penals are the counterpart to P-Grens". But... think about it, the squad wipe potential is vastly different to output...
One mine = half a OST squad dead, = retreat.
2 snipers, and you have to run.
1 mortar shell or nade can easily wipe a squad...
Late game, a dozer sherman/HE round sherman, Scott, Pakhowitzer, Brit Centaur or even a IS2 can easily AND QUICKLY 1 shot a vet 3 gren squad....
As for a 5-6 man squad that aint gonna happen unless they position clump.
If you compensated cost for the 5th man of a gren squad, it would be fine. The only reason anyone would oppose that is either they dont play the game, or they're enjoying their allied win spree. (which trust me, ive done before, im not proud of it, was to prove a point).
You are very right indeed. They are the faction that has to retreat the most often. Unfair how they are just limited to a weapon upgrade compared to Tommies having 5 men and 2 brens. Default boost behind cover also providing additional performance. Even just having 5 man with upgrade is even better.
Still think Conscripts should get default PPSH, maybe a worse profile version. Take away their Oraah (sprint ability) and have upgrade option for them. Make them used more often.
Give Osteehr either access to armour upgrades or additonal weapon upgrades.
Pzgrens should have additional armour upgrades or a 5 man option. Since they drop fast. No weapon upgrades for them.
Grens should have maybe either a 5 man option with at least a weapon upgrade
and another option would be instead trade for more firepower
Can combine MG42 upgrade with G43, 4 man squad.
This will fix their issues for starters.
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
How about giving Grens the ability to build sandbags just like VGs?
Then they'd lose ability to make Bunkers.
Originally, Pioneers couldn't make sandbags, bunkers WERE the sandbags.
If going to give sandbags and bunkers to all german units, why not give bunkers to OKW as default
as well as tank traps?
Make all german units 6 man squads, and say soviets were the most numerous when they're
out-gunned AND out-manned?
Posts: 76
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
OKW is the SS right?
No, its Oberkomand West.
Posts: 76
No, its Oberkomand West.
Wonder why they didnt put the SS in?
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Wonder why they didnt put the SS in?
Because they were not military?
Posts: 76
Because they were not military?
They were the "Armed Wing of Hitler" and they were very elite compared to Wehrmacht. How were they not a military force? I would like to see them and some elite American Units in Coh3.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
They were the "Armed Wing of Hitler" and they were very elite compared to Wehrmacht. How were they not a military force? I would like to see them and some elite American Units in Coh3.
Again, they were political, not military.
Just because you have an uniform and a gun does not make you a soldier.
Best equipment doesn't make you most elite either.
Posts: 76
They were the "Armed Wing of Hitler" and they were very elite compared to Wehrmacht. How were they not a military force? I would like to see them and some elite American Units in Coh3.
Military branch =/= military division
Posts: 378
Have you tried not to face mash that upgrade button on 251 and actually use it to reinforce in combat?
Utter unabashed and relentless genius. How do you do it katitof? Solved all wehrs problems with a single click.
Posts: 378
Again, they were political, not military.
Just because you have an uniform and a gun does not make you a soldier.
Best equipment doesn't make you most elite either.
Does serving in war in a combat role make you a soldier?
Posts: 469
How about bunkers didn´t cost manpower to build, but upgrading them cost manpower + munitions.
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
I had an idea.
How about bunkers didn´t cost manpower to build, but upgrading them cost manpower + munitions.
What's your rank again?
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
Livestreams
84 | |||||
43 | |||||
26 | |||||
15 | |||||
8 | |||||
7 | |||||
1 | |||||
652 | |||||
24 | |||||
18 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.653231.739+13
- 2.838223.790+1
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.590233.717+6
- 5.278108.720+29
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.645.928+5
- 8.922406.694+1
- 9.1118621.643-1
- 10.265138.658+2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
2 posts in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, KETTA
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM