Posts: 1096
One could simply have 2 fire modes direct and indirect.
Direct fires AP rounds to low range indirect fires HE.
Instead of suppression I suggest "shell shock" a critical that reduces the DPS of the unit affected. (same goes for ST).
Direct hit could cause vehicles critical like driver injured gunner injured instead.
The unit then could have utility instead of raw fire power.
Posts: 2358
Posts: 5279
The problem is not with the unit but who uses it...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNPOJfIt-x8
No, i dont like the B4 idea, stop wanting 4s to become more arty fested cancer OP. Demanding USF arty failed, now you want SU to go overpowered
Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13
Posts: 206
Posts: 2358
Posts: 5279
The only more or less consistent way for B-4 to operate will be guided spotting. I mean, if a sniper gets an ability to spot for a B-4 and then give all the prior said reworks. If it keeps being so random spread to shoot its the same as it is now
Sniper used as an example. Cons should not be able to spot IMO.
Posts: 2
The problem is not with the unit but who uses it...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNPOJfIt-x8
No, i dont like the B4 idea, stop wanting 4s to become more arty fested cancer OP. Demanding USF arty failed, now you want SU to go overpowered
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Posts: 21
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
Posts: 3260
Posts: 5279
Could you make the targeting deploy red warning smoke, then make it accurate?
That way the opponent's tanks won't get OHKed with no warning, but the B4 can actually do what it's meant to do.
Posts: 2358
We got a problem here?
 |
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
8 | ||
 |
|
|
70 | ||
|
|
|
|
19 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
