Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
Riflemen need a little buff
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
In my personal opinion the game is going in wrong direction with powerful infantry early on that can brutally and frontally attack the enemy.
Or powerful light vehicles that simply hold too much shock value.
The use of combined arm has simply been lowered.
The fire fights simply last a sort period and do not actually allow tactical movement to have meaningful impact.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 3260
Posts: 591 | Subs: 1
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
1CP Pathfinders makes them incredibly awkward to put in builds: the early CP tracker isn't a consistent timer.
The current cooldown based solution is much better for preventing easy Pathfinder spam.
Posts: 1220
cp0 units in t0 i like it
CP 0 units are map depend.
For instance they can spawn allot closer to the front-line from "rail and metal" on south side than in the north.
A far better solution imo would be for this units to become build able from HQ so that it does not upset the built times of faction allow numerical advantage.
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
In my personal opinion the game is going in wrong direction with powerful infantry early on that can brutally and frontally attack the enemy.
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
In my personal opinion the game is going in wrong direction with powerful infantry early on that can brutally and frontally attack the enemy.
Or powerful light vehicles that simply hold too much shock value.
The use of combined arm has simply been lowered.
The fire fights simply last a sort period and do not actually allow tactical movement to have meaningful impact.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
I don't think this is bad per sé, as it creates a lot of diversity and tension. Personally I really liked how the Commander Revamp Patch has greatly increased the number of viable units and strats because it has added a huge amount of variety.
Around the time of GCS2 the game was perhaps too balanced which just made matches rather boring (same meta used every match) and dragged almost every game into an hour long slugfest.
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
Riflemen buffs would completly brake the game at this point. USF was weak before all the changes but now they are actually the best allied faction for 1v1 and 2v2 (depending on map and match-up). No way should they get a buff to their mainline infantry.
Posts: 155
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
My only gripe is the changes to Recon. I'm used to it by now, and I'm OK with the AT gun being gone and CP3 airdrop rework, but I feel like the changes to the pack howie were unnecessary.
That, and the increase in price of I&R Pathfinders is too expensive. They should be a cheaper unit, maybe 270mp is a reasonable middle ground. I'm fine with the delay to spawn them too now that I'm used to it, I played Recon all the time when they were 1CP and had no problems with that either, even though I always wished they were 0CP at the time. If they decrease the price of I&R AND Airborne Pathfinders I'll be very happy. Right now at 290mp I don't have much incentive to build either unit outside of getting one squad for its LOS when I need that.
Outside of this, the game is pretty decent, not too many issues in any factions, and there's been a lot of positive changes lately, such as giving UKF a snare through Royal Engineers, and the changes to JLI.
Posts: 392
10 Posts: 871
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
http://coh2chart.com/ axis is op in team game
Unfortunately, Relic hasn't been able to update their database since 16.5.2017. The charts aren't up to date anymore.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
 |
|
|
22 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
1835 | ||
 |
|
|
203 | ||
 |
|
|
183 | ||
 |
|
|
39 | ||
 |
|
|
23 | ||
|
|
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
10 | ||
|
|
|
|
7 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
