Login

russian armor

How would you like the JLI to be nerfed?

PAGES (9)down
21 Jan 2019, 19:26 PM
#161
avatar of Premium_Hacker

Posts: 24



I would disagree that the Brits are the worst performing faction in the game at the moment, but they sure as hell used to be and the main reason they are workable now is because of the non-doctrinal acess to snares.

Are you seriously comparing a normal Churchill to a Tiger tank? If that's the case then I'm not sure that even dignifies an answer.



Yes. many times both as them and against them.
You misinterpreted what i had to say about the churchills. Ostheer can get only one heavy tank right? But brits, they can get 3 churchills and butt fuck everything on the field. The churchill is legit a counter to everything as so are soviet guards. My point stands.
21 Jan 2019, 19:45 PM
#162
avatar of Joshua85

Posts: 606

You misinterpreted what i had to say about the churchills. Ostheer can get only one heavy tank right? But brits, they can get 3 churchills and butt fuck everything on the field. The churchill is legit a counter to everything as so are soviet guards. My point stands.


It stands you say? Have you tried testing a churchill against a Tiger in 1v1? After that I think you would agree that it's more comparable to a panther and how many of these are the germans allowed to have?
21 Jan 2019, 23:26 PM
#163
avatar of Premium_Hacker

Posts: 24



It stands you say? Have you tried testing a churchill against a Tiger in 1v1? After that I think you would agree that it's more comparable to a panther and how many of these are the germans allowed to have?

Panthers have way less armor and health, and tiger is under performing due to mass allied tank destroyer spam. How come axis barely have non-doctrinal tank destroyers.
21 Jan 2019, 23:40 PM
#164
avatar of Sander93

Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6

Panther has 260 armor, Churchill Mk.VII has 240 armor. It's also very good versus Churchills because it can easily kite it with its 50 range versus the Churchill's 40 range (and 92% chance to pen at max range versus Churchill's 40%/37%).
21 Jan 2019, 23:59 PM
#165
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8


Panthers have way less armor and health, and tiger is under performing due to mass allied tank destroyer spam. How come axis barely have non-doctrinal tank destroyers.

A mix of denial about JP4 and StuG and existence of panther made specifically to counter heavies.
22 Jan 2019, 00:16 AM
#166
avatar of LoopDloop

Posts: 3053


Panthers have way less armor and health, and tiger is under performing due to mass allied tank destroyer spam. How come axis barely have non-doctrinal tank destroyers.

>barely
>both axis factions have 2 kinds of tank destroying tanks

In all seriousness, both have the panther and ost has the stug, which is great against anything other than allied TDs (since it gets outranged by them), and okw has the JP4, which is all around solid, comparable to allied TDs, and only hampered at all by the fact that it isn't turreted.
22 Jan 2019, 00:25 AM
#167
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279


>barely
>both axis factions have 2 kinds of tank destroying tanks

In all seriousness, both have the panther and ost has the stug, which is great against anything other than allied TDs (since it gets outranged by them), and okw has the JP4, which is all around solid, comparable to allied TDs, and only hampered at all by the fact that it isn't turreted.

Jp4 lacks pen also. It's a great unit, but it's not comparable because allied TDs are pen machines but the jp4 isn't. (great unit tho, I don't want to see it be an over buffed monster)
22 Jan 2019, 00:43 AM
#168
avatar of LoopDloop

Posts: 3053


Jp4 lacks pen also. It's a great unit, but it's not comparable because allied TDs are pen machines but the jp4 isn't. (great unit tho, I don't want to see it be an over buffed monster)

I guess that's true. Although it doesn't matter a ton as in most situations it's engaging pretty low armored medium tanks/TDs and it has a pretty decent firerate.
22 Jan 2019, 08:45 AM
#169
avatar of Joshua85

Posts: 606


Panthers have way less armor..


:rofl::rofl:
22 Jan 2019, 19:27 PM
#170
avatar of insaneHoshi

Posts: 911

jump backJump back to quoted post21 Jan 2019, 23:59 PMKatitof

A mix of denial about JP4 and StuG and existence of panther made specifically to counter heavies.


Wheras allies can just build one and counter all types, right?
22 Jan 2019, 19:36 PM
#171
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8



Wheras allies can just build one and counter all types, right?


Well, yeah.
It might be a shocker to you, but allies do not have up to 3 TDs in their stock tech each designed specifically to counter its tier.

Its just one which is at the top of tech tree and needs to do all the job.
Soviets used to have 2 options, but "balance" happened and again only 1 exists.
PAGES (9)down
2 users are browsing this thread: 2 guests

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

800 users are online: 800 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
40 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49070
Welcome our newest member, Blesofsk
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM