Let's talk about the scott

Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2018, 10:08 AMEsxile

You're the one turning balance issues into your personal issue to understand the basic of each faction.
If you say something stupid, I'll not blame the balance or the game, but say you said something stupid.

Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2018, 10:08 AMEsxile

In this case I've been kind enough to tell you to play more with USF instead and not being so affirmative with your opinion.

Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2018, 10:08 AMEsxile

Because if your 800 games with USF would have been enough for you to understand the game mechanisms, you'll have see that USF isn't design around having AT capability every time available and thus USF units need to be design with this aspect, especially when they are only available late game.

Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2018, 10:08 AMEsxile

This may change with the new patch but at the moment, there is nothing evident that shows the Scott over value a Pz4 that comes a couple of minutes later with the same AI potential once upgraded with in addition strong AT capability.

Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2018, 13:51 PMelchino7

I still think the late game indirect fire department of USF should be carried by the Pack Howie.

Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2018, 13:51 PMelchino7

I still think the late game indirect fire department of USF should be carried by the Pack Howie.

Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2018, 14:07 PMddd

Yeah, and late game indirect fire for okw should be carried by leig. Remove stuka.

Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2018, 14:53 PMelchino7

Reworked Pack Howie. Like firing old vet 2 shells on barrage with more shells.

Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2018, 14:34 PMEsxile

PakHowi exit the field the moment Stuka/Pzwerfer hit the field. That's probably the only stock unit I would every game retreat and refit if such option existed.

Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2018, 08:58 AMVipper

That is simply incorrect.

Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2018, 08:58 AMVipper

Scott have some of the best defensive properties that include:
400 HP
19 size
7 speed
40 Rotate
Defensive smoke
barrage on the move

Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2018, 10:30 AMVipper

If a player find himself in situation where his opponent has medium tanks and he has not AT assets he probably has done something wrong and that has nothing to do with performance of the Scott itself.

Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2018, 16:29 PMSkysTheLimit

Do you think the Scott needs to be nerfed? Cause I said it was fine, so I really don't care if you disagree. It's not "simply incorrect", you disagree. Congratulations.

Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2018, 16:29 PMSkysTheLimit

Some of the best? First of all, why did you list 400 hp? Being a t4 vehicle with 400 health is not a positive, and it needs all the other things you mentioned specifically because its health and armor are so low...

Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2018, 16:51 PMVipper

Both armor and HP is allot more than 160HP that other T4 units like kayusha and Wefer have.

Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2018, 16:29 PMSkysTheLimit

Do you think the Scott needs to be nerfed? Cause I said it was fine, so I really don't care if you disagree. It's not "simply incorrect", you disagree. Congratulations.



Some of the best? First of all, why did you list 400 hp? Being a t4 vehicle with 400 health is not a positive, and it needs all the other things you mentioned specifically because its health and armor are so low...



If I need OTHER AT assets to protect a t4 vehicle, that unit is by definition hard to keep alive. Your mistake is assuming I'm saying that there's something wrong with that. Snipers can be hard to keep alive too, and require other units for protection.

Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2018, 19:13 PMFelixTHM

By that nonsensical definition, even vehicles like Ostwind and Centaur are hard to keep alive.

No dude, the Scott is insanely easy to keep alive. It's almost impossible to kill because it has a Stuart chassis while having long range, which puts it out of AT fire and makes it impossible to snare. 400hp is significantly more than any mortar halftrack or rocket artillery like stuka/pwerfer/katy. It's super fast, has small target size, and has smoke. I don't understand how you can even warp logic to the point that you can say the Scott is "hard to keep alive".

You can disagree about its accuracy/bleed being too good, or claim its cost and tier justifies its performance, but no sane player could possibly claim that the Scott is hard to keep alive.

Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2018, 01:28 AMSkysTheLimit

Scott is in just the right place IMO. If it's getting changed at all, I would say nerf it and move it to captain (part 2, or whatever we're calling the second tier upgrade).

Having it arrive earlier but with less power as to not punch too hard for it's time would be kinda nice. Sometimes i feel like it's too late to get one even when I could really use it. They can be hard to keep alive if you don't have any real tanks to keep it protected.

Jump back to quoted post13 Dec 2018, 11:43 AMullumulu

two scotts are way better than old brummbar... u can wipe from safe distance..run superfast around the map..smoke...hit and run.. u need so less micro...because this shells even hits running squads...from FAR range