Why is the M20 so trashy?
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
You need to kill 12 models of grenadiers and the unit simply doesn't kill anything, many time after 2 or 3 minutes of usage and micro, you barely get 1 or 2 kills.
So I did some cheatmod tests and checked the stats with what is the closest unit, the 222:
222 is simply doing double damage at 35 range than the M20
222 35 range = 8.085
M20 35 range = 4.216
And in fact that pretty much a no match from range 0 to 35 even considering the 4men squad of Ostheer.
So why is the M20 so trashy?
Because of the mine? Can't see any sense in it, I see the mine as an incensitive to build the M20 not a primary function which would make the M20 dps secondary.
Posts: 1096
I often back-tech to it though if the enemy is fond of diving deep with their tanks.
Posts: 378
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
It's not trashy, you don't know how to use it.
Hope you would explain.
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
It's not trashy, you don't know how to use it.
I agree it´s not trashy, just a bit too expensive in MP.
Posts: 3053
Posts: 129
The HT is better 10/10 times
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
The M20 is a decent unit (and super fun to use) but its way overpriced IMO; it costs the same manpower as a Sherman It shouldn't need a skirts upgrade (which still doesn't prevent it from dying in two hits) and vets super slow but other than that it's a pretty good unit. It has pretty decent long range damage and shines when chasing down retreating units at close range (which it's fast enough to do) or flanking lone team weapons because of its very good close range dps.
Which imo make it trashy in the current meta.
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Posts: 1527
Permanently BannedPosts: 1527
Permanently BannedPosts: 3166 | Subs: 6
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
Posts: 2885
To be hones though, I would much prefer if other rush vehicles were simply made more expensive, similar to the m20. Right now that we all rush LVs, there is not much of the true coh infantry play in the game.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4
Lower MP to 220 and increase buildtime so it doesn't come out faster.
Posts: 3260
Posts: 3053
Performance is fine I think but the cost should go way down. Around 250 manpower and 30 fuel. Maybe make the side skirts standard issue.
+1
IMO vet requirements are way too high right now too considering it doesn't do crazy amounts of damage or anything.
Posts: 378
Hope you would explain.
Imagine you're in a game where you're getting outmatched, your rifleman can hardly keep any offensive up and your opponent is going to get his first light in the field.
The M20 is here to help, you can apply good pressure, get fast dps(your compare the dps to the 222, did you check the scatter value on each?)
And...you get a free bazooka...
If your opponent is ostheer and happen to get a sniper, you can trade your M20 for it.
It's a expensive unit overall but it does its job.
Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4
If your opponent is ostheer and happen to get a sniper, you can trade your M20 for it.
It's a expensive unit overall but it does its job.
Awful trade.
340 mp 20 fuel 60 muni for 360 mp and probably giving the enemy a bazooka.
Livestreams
25 | |||||
5 | |||||
4 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.940410.696+6
- 4.35459.857-1
- 5.599234.719+7
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
NigelBallsworth
10 posts in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, lyrefudge
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM