Should sniper be more effective vs. buildings?
Me and my mate's sniper shooting like 6 shoots at the M42 member in the building, not one model die, do building need such necessary god-like protection level?
or you want PB? I can share that..... I'm really pissing off by COH2's building cover...
Sniper vs. buidings
25 Aug 2013, 05:54 AM
#1
Posts: 954
First off all. Tripwire so gud, 10 ammo for a whole dead squad ? + sight.
Vehicle capture point can win games, blitzkrieg save a tank. Fair Deal i think
25 Aug 2013, 05:56 AM
#2
Posts: 170
Snipers have a 60% accuracy reduction vs buildings (.4 accuracy); they mentioned this in a stream stating that they wanted buildings to feel 'safe' and that snipers easily sniping men out of buildings discouraged using them.
25 Aug 2013, 06:02 AM
#3
Posts: 954
Snipers have a 60% accuracy reduction vs buildings (.4 accuracy); they mentioned this in a stream stating that they wanted buildings to feel 'safe' and that snipers easily sniping men out of buildings discouraged using them.
Building game is boring.....like they said in the first world cup match
First off all. Tripwire so gud, 10 ammo for a whole dead squad ? + sight.
Vehicle capture point can win games, blitzkrieg save a tank. Fair Deal i think
25 Aug 2013, 06:12 AM
#4
Posts: 396
Snipers have a 60% accuracy reduction vs buildings (.4 accuracy); they mentioned this in a stream stating that they wanted buildings to feel 'safe' and that snipers easily sniping men out of buildings discouraged using them.
Again,
What is the point of the Ostheer sniper?
25 Aug 2013, 06:30 AM
#5
Posts: 954
Again,
What is the point of the Ostheer sniper?
enemy go T2 you go sniper
First off all. Tripwire so gud, 10 ammo for a whole dead squad ? + sight.
Vehicle capture point can win games, blitzkrieg save a tank. Fair Deal i think
25 Aug 2013, 06:36 AM
#6
Posts: 1221 | Subs: 41
Maybe if they wanted people to feel buildings are safe they should remove the instant collapse on critical and the ability for even a scout car to crush a building.
25 Aug 2013, 13:03 PM
#7
9 
Posts: 2072 | Subs: 1
Maybe if they wanted people to feel buildings are safe they should remove the instant collapse on critical and the ability for even a scout car to crush a building.
Exactly.
25 Aug 2013, 15:31 PM
#8
Posts: 644
Maybe if they wanted people to feel buildings are safe they should remove the instant collapse on critical and the ability for even a scout car to crush a building.
Agree. But the whole idea of houses being "safe" is stupid.
5 OP OH tanks in front of your base
blow one up, slap it around
7 OP OH tanks in front of your base
blow one up, slap it around
7 OP OH tanks in front of your base
25 Aug 2013, 15:45 PM
#9
Posts: 299
I don't mind buildings being safe. I just fell that there should be more reliable ways of dislodging units out of them, especially if my opponent puts an mg in them.
 | Playercard of RtN.Con | |||||||||||||||||||
|
25 Aug 2013, 20:03 PM
#10
Posts: 176
Let's not turn Snipers into VCOH Snipers - They were op as hell.
25 Aug 2013, 20:10 PM
#11
Posts: 194
Let's not turn Snipers into VCOH Snipers - They were op as hell.
I've been toying around with what it would be like if snipers were made doctrinal. That could justify fixing some of their issues and letting them be powerful, because it could be limited in other ways based on the other abilities and whatnot.
Back OT: Yes, snipers should hit things reliably. It's the sole point of the expensive and fragile unit.
26 Aug 2013, 06:13 AM
#12
Posts: 2425
Permanently BannedI disagree.
I think buildings should provide ample protection vs Suppression and Snipers.
Small arms, however, need a boost vs buildings, as do small calibre Mortars (specifically as building damage, to destroy the building).
I think buildings should provide ample protection vs Suppression and Snipers.
Small arms, however, need a boost vs buildings, as do small calibre Mortars (specifically as building damage, to destroy the building).
26 Aug 2013, 15:15 PM
#13
Posts: 101
I disagree.
I think buildings should provide ample protection vs Suppression and Snipers.
Small arms, however, need a boost vs buildings, as do small calibre Mortars.
Yes, this. The protection vs. small arms is over the top right now, IMO.
26 Aug 2013, 15:31 PM
#14
Posts: 604
Maybe they could change point blank to also reduce (but not ignore) the effect of garrison cover?
That way you could deal some damage if you get close enough and against HMGs you could dance around the building.
It'd kinda make sense because once you are very close you'd most likely be able to shoot diagonally through windows and hit people using the wall left or right of it as cover. Or you could stick a SMG (if you have one) into the window and just spray+pray.
That way you could deal some damage if you get close enough and against HMGs you could dance around the building.
It'd kinda make sense because once you are very close you'd most likely be able to shoot diagonally through windows and hit people using the wall left or right of it as cover. Or you could stick a SMG (if you have one) into the window and just spray+pray.
26 Aug 2013, 15:43 PM
#15
Posts: 2425
Permanently Banned@rofltehcat: Interesting suggestion! Would sort of indirectly emulate "storming" the building!
26 Aug 2013, 18:45 PM
#16
Posts: 135
I disagree.
I think buildings should provide ample protection vs Suppression and Snipers.
Small arms, however, need a boost vs buildings, as do small calibre Mortars (specifically as building damage, to destroy the building).
If a rifle grenade can take out a building and a mortar shell can't something is wrong.
No doubt this is a glitch and they will fix it.
"The devil is not as terrible as he is painted" - Joseph Stalin, 1941 in reference to the German war machine.
26 Aug 2013, 18:58 PM
#17
Posts: 101
Maybe they could change point blank to also reduce (but not ignore) the effect of garrison cover?
That way you could deal some damage if you get close enough and against HMGs you could dance around the building.
It'd kinda make sense because once you are very close you'd most likely be able to shoot diagonally through windows and hit people using the wall left or right of it as cover. Or you could stick a SMG (if you have one) into the window and just spray+pray.
Really cool idea here!
27 Aug 2013, 07:46 AM
#18
Posts: 13
Should sniper be more effective vs. buildings?
Me and my mate's sniper shooting like 6 shoots at the M42 member in the building, not one model die, do building need such necessary god-like protection level?
or you want PB? I can share that..... I'm really pissing off by COH2's building cover...
PB shall immune to suppression as... well they're suicide squad.
27 Aug 2013, 08:51 AM
#19
Posts: 337
Buildings are "safe" until a single mortar shot takes out a building with 80% hp. The RNG strikes again.
SC2 Team: It's Gosu Esports - http://www.itsgosu.com/
COH2: http://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561197999392868
COH2: http://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561197999392868
27 Aug 2013, 09:44 AM
#20
Posts: 69
Buildings are "safe" until a single mortar shot takes out a building with 80% hp. The RNG strikes again.
Isn't it a sweet deal if it's your mortar?
0 user is browsing this thread:
Livestreams
 |
|
|
17 | ||
 |
|
|
154 | ||
 |
|
|
32 | ||
 |
|
|
13 | ||
|
|
|
|
12 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.940410.696+6
- 4.35459.857-1
- 5.599234.719+7
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
11
Download
1265