wasp cost fuel now ?
Not wasp, regular UC.
Universal carrier DOES NOT cost fuel it cost 260 manpower.
Upgrading to wasp does require Platoon command post that cost 180/30
PLS stop spreading misinformation.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
wasp cost fuel now ?
Not wasp, regular UC.
Posts: 3260
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
If it's at all relevant the Panzer II Luchs was given a bonus versus garrisons a few patches ago.
Posts: 138
Regardless it remain average at best vs garrison.
Posts: 587
Average? Please pit it against AEC, Stuart and show me how average vs garrisons it is then. It's more like the best light tank along with t-70
Posts: 4474
no it does not cost fuel
Not wasp, regular UC.
Posts: 503 | Subs: 1
Average? Please pit it against AEC, Stuart and show me how average vs garrisons it is then. It's more like the best light tank along with t-70
Posts: 609
Posts: 5279
I'm all for flames (preferably flame-nade just because it doesn't eat up a precious sweeper slot) on Sturmpios. With a much-needed vet tuning and possibly making the Mech Truck repair pios not exorbitantly overpriced to move some jobs off the Sturms and it should be alright.
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
no it does not cost fuel
Posts: 4474
same for flame nades what's the point ??
Please guys, I was saying you need 30 fuel before being able to use the Wasp, not that it cost 30 fuel each one.
Like it is not a T0 ability.
Posts: 518
same for flame nades what's the point ??
(most funny is "RRRREEEEE flame nades are free they come with tech cost" but "the wasp cost fuel as it comes only after tier 1")
Posts: 911
Posts: 728
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.
Posts: 728
Posts: 223
Posts: 503 | Subs: 1
Posts: 138
Stuart and AEC also suck vs garrison. Being the best of sucking against garrisons still means you suck against garrisons.
Posts: 518
Brits suck vs garrisons more than OKW do, even if you removed flame nade they would still be a lot weaker vs them.
13 | |||||
38 | |||||
9 | |||||
7 | |||||
2 |