Jackson Overperforming
Posts: 4785 | Subs: 3
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
If a vehicle counters the Jackson it counters USF's whole vehicular lineup.
The Jackson does not need to be nerfed so much that it can be countered, but it could be toned down a little so it loses its complete dominance over any Axis tanks. It just has too many good things that make it a bit too (cost) effective. I'm on board with a slight nerf (or reversing the buff) to its mobility for example.
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Posts: 3260
The Jackson does not need to be nerfed so much that it can be countered, but it could be toned down a little so it loses its complete dominance over any Axis tanks. It just has too many good things that make it a bit too (cost) effective. I'm on board with a slight nerf (or reversing the buff) to its mobility for example.
I'm not sure it is dominant. It's not a glass cannon like the Firefly any more but it still doesn't want to take head on slugging matches with JPIVs or Panthers.
Posts: 808
Posts: 2243
The Jackson received a popcap nerf so Jackson spam is less of an issue now: any player that heavily invests in Jacksons is going to have a fairly small army outside of them.
As for its strong performance against tanks in a slugging match, that's what it's for. If StuGs could counter Jacksons then they'd counter the entire USF vehicle fleet.
lel...popcap ...as USF...never played this faction right?? you can hops out of the jackson..and wuppie..you can build an other ... LEL...popcap as USF...
Posts: 3260
lel...popcap ...as USF...never played this faction right?? you can hops out of the jackson..and wuppie..you can build an other ... LEL...popcap as USF...
https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/viewBoard/0/steamid/76561198031945233
Unless you plan on decrewing your entire vehicle fleet whenever you want to reinforce your infantry you're not going to go very far over your popcap as USF.
Posts: 2243
https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/viewBoard/0/steamid/76561198031945233
Unless you plan on decrewing your entire vehicle fleet whenever you want to reinforce your infantry you're not going to go very far over your popcap as USF.
Which infantery? In teamgame? In lategame? in lategame you can all do with shermans and jackson...repair and cap....you never played them right? you could have more than 99999999999999999999999 jackson if the game is long enough.
Posts: 1044 | Subs: 1
Posts: 495 | Subs: 1
However, there is a solution.
Make the M10 non doctrinal and available to the Captian. The M10 then can be made into the medium tank killer and the M36 Jackson can be made into a dedicated heavy killer. This would result in a dynamic similar to the SU-76 vs SU-85 that Soviets have. Of course it has to be done carefully or else you end up with too much overlap or one being OP like how the SU-76 used to be.
US could use a large change to their teching structure. I will be posting a thread on how I believe it could be reworked in the future.
Posts: 464
doesnt deserve have oyu palyed them hgave oyu seen how hard is to keep riflemen alive even if oyu lose oyur volks or grens oyu got obers sodlat OP as f and panzer grens that vet so fast then axis doesnt deserve tiger and OWK doesnt deserve King tiger not commander
I am not looking for advice on how to counter Jacksons. Of course paks and pgrens are effective counters, but it doesn't change the fact that it is overperforming. Jackson is too good against OKW as well, although the jp4 can definitely go toe to toe better than the stug can.
USF doesn't deserve to have both the best mainline infantry in the game as well as the best TD. I am not even asking for a large nerf here. Like I said I think a small pen nerf at far range is all it needs. It can easily be made up for by using HVAP rounds, an underrated ability which I often see players neglect.
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
Didnt the jackson get some ninja nefs? Like range down to 55 and slightly less accuracy at long range? or was it patched out?
'Far range' was nerfed to 55 which apparently means very slightly less accuracy and penetration at max range (so I've been told). Firing range itself is still 60.
I'm not sure it is dominant. It's not a glass cannon like the Firefly any more but it still doesn't want to take head on slugging matches with JPIVs or Panthers.
I think there's a big difference between 1v1/2v2 and 3v3/4v4 here. I don't think the Jackson overperforms in the first type of games because engagements are typically all over the place. In teamgames however, with most maps having corridor fights, the Jackson can just bully Axis armor at max range and then retreat behind a wall of AT guns when the enemy tanks counter attack. It's a bit too good at kiting because of its extreme mobility combined with huge range and accuracy/penetration and even an HP pool large enough to take some hits.
Posts: 138
You shouldn't just be able to spam P4's and destroy everything. So it's a no from me.
Posts: 3260
I think there's a big difference between 1v1/2v2 and 3v3/4v4 here. I don't think the Jackson overperforms in the first type of games because engagements are typically all over the place. In teamgames however, with most maps having corridor fights, the Jackson can just bully Axis armor at max range and then retreat behind a wall of AT guns when the enemy tanks counter attack. It's a bit too good at kiting because of its extreme mobility combined with huge range and accuracy/penetration and even an HP pool large enough to take some hits.
Can't the StuG and JPIV do the same in that situation?
Posts: 5279
nerfing the acceleration would just make it a sitting duck for P4 spam again, Axis armour should be a mixed composition against different vehicles. Jackson should force you to invest in Shreks, Pak, or Panther for example.
You shouldn't just be able to spam P4's and destroy everything. So it's a no from me.
Mixed composition eh?
"hah a p4!"
*uses jackson*
OH no a panther
*uses jackson*
Gasp! A JP4
Jackson
KING TIGER
ahem jackson
Blyat a captured is-2
Jackson
Elefant?
Flank with a jackson
Rocket arty behind the enemy lines!
Dives with highly mobile jackson
OH no a mine and a blew my engine
Uses crew In Jackson
But yea the enemy should definitely employ combined arms
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Mixed composition eh?
"hah a p4!"
*uses jackson*
OH no a panther
*uses jackson*
Gasp! A JP4
Jackson
KING TIGER
ahem jackson
Blyat a captured is-2
Jackson
Elefant?
Flank with a jackson
Rocket arty behind the enemy lines!
Dives with highly mobile jackson
OH no a mine and a blew my engine
Uses crew In Jackson
But yea the enemy should definitely employ combined arms
Gee, I wonder what would happen if axis factions had AT guns and AT infantry.
Posts: 5279
Gee, I wonder what would happen if axis factions had AT guns and AT infantry.
The other omi potent unit usf has. Rifles. Slap a couple bars on em ball em together and anything unarmour will die. That's the beautiful design of the usf. Many units, but 2 will do.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
The other omi potent unit usf has. Rifles. Slap a couple bars on em ball em together and anything unarmour will die. That's the beautiful design of the usf. Many units, but 2 will do.
Yeah, I'd like to see you do that.
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
It's not like you got any other options, because doctrinal options are usually all-rounders, the Jackson is the USF lategame and what used to hold back the faction when it was a meme.
Livestreams
2 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.830222.789+36
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.572211.731+1
- 4.1098613.642+2
- 5.916404.694-1
- 6.280162.633+8
- 7.305114.728+1
- 8.721440.621+3
- 9.14758.717+1
- 10.1028667.606+5
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Hanfvfdkin
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM