Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Even if it wasn't, it still is supposed to be effective and reliable vs medium armor and it needs to be more effective then 85 against it, otherwise it would be pointless to field again, as it was in the past.
Same with StuG vs panther.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
SU-85 already is not prefered way to fight meds, so that already happened.
Posts: 911
If you're using 200+ fuel multiple units on a singular MG, there better be nothing left out of it.
Posts: 89
if the stug and su76 is nerfed again why the hell would anyone build it. we'd be back to the same crappy meme td's and then thers guna be another topic saying how UP these units and the circle jerk will continue.
For the su76, just increase the barrage cost or just replace it something else (no AI) so it becomes a pure TD and increase its vet requirements, finished.
Honestly, anymore nerfs on the stug would render it useless
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
Following your logic JT is better now with less DPS but with an artillery ability becouse its not specialised AT. I'll suprise you: that was a huge nerf.
Surely, the barrage should not be free on su-76. But nerfing its range or penetration will go a long way in rendering the unit useless.
btw. JT has an ability that is pretty much what su-76 barrage is, just with cost, more range and better shells.
Posts: 2243
With 5-6 Pak 40, you can insta boom a T34/76.
Pak 40 should be nerfed. Used right they are devastating.
ie: SU-76 snowballing.
Sigh.
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
Then Su-85 needs to become less effective vs mediums same as the Panther and Stug.
Once more SU-76 is OP, its far penetration is too high, its barrage is too spam-able and XP value too low.
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
Just because it the most cost efficient way it does not mean it is bad at it. Compared to the performance of the SU-85 and the cost differences, Panther should it mediums for breakfast.
But this thread is about Su-76 that is Op.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
============
- Did you just say Panther and StuG need to be less effective vs mediums?
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
pak cant do anything vs infantery, is not superfast and mobil...
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
Depends, medium tanks should be an investment worth the cost, currently more TDs and infantry are built because many TDs are OP.
If you to understand what I wrote read it all the posts.
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Your sentence makes no sense? :/
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
What's funny is to see the new Oshteer meta falling into heavy T1, 4Gren, sometime 5 with 1 or 2 HMG42 to support them. But that's not spam and blob, that's heavy T1 strategy
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
I was replaying to the argument that the SU-85/SU-76 relationship is similar to the Stug/Panther relationship.
It is not, Su-85 is more cost efficient than Panther vs mediums (and heavies).
The fact remains SU-76 is OP.
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
Although true, would you like to see snipers built? or 4x 42s? That's like saying USF blobs rifles because they build AT LEAST 3 every game. It's not that they're building it its that they're building something when they have no other options.
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
And you know what is?
Puma!
Can you guess what 5 pumas do to literally ANY allied armor, IS-2 included?
Everything spammed will feel imba, its called critical mass.
 |
|
|
170 | ||
 |
|
|
116 | ||
 |
|
|
28 | ||
|
|
|
|
21 | ||
 |
|
|
16 | ||
 |
|
|
14 | ||
 |
|
|
61 | ||
|
|
|
|
36 | ||
|
|
|
|
33 | ||
|
|
|
|
11 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
