What to do with the KT?
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Posts: 1273
Posts: 558 | Subs: 1
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Increase size and have certain units use special high penetration low accuracy munition against it.
The reason I simple one can not balance such powerful units across all modes. They will either be too powerful in 1vs1 or too weak in 4vs4 while any attempts to balance TDs against the KT, makes TDs OP vs medium tanks.
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1273
Posts: 26
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Its fine as it is.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 22
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
Posts: 207
Its pretty much slow non doctrinal IS-2 with more HP, more range and 50% higher damage.
Its fine as it is.
The problem with comparing it to the IS 2 and saying its fine is that the IS 2 is also in a pretty bad spot right now. They both have the same problem, their scatter sucks, so they can hardly hit infantry, the difference is that the KT has to fight larger and better squads with better supporting TDs.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
The problem with comparing it to the IS 2 and saying its fine is that the IS 2 is also in a pretty bad spot right now. They both have the same problem, their scatter sucks, so they can hardly hit infantry, the difference is that the KT has to fight larger and better squads with better supporting TDs.
That's why KT has more hp and higher damage.
It itself also is supposed to have a backup of infantry.
And I completely fail to see how a tank having to fight tank destroyers which hardcounter it should be any issue here. If you are using all or nothing card, you need to be ready to lose it when opponent is prepared with correct counter, especially now that allied TDs are actually able to put a dent in its armor.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 609
Posts: 3260
Posts: 1044 | Subs: 1
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Posts: 808
10 
Posts: 4785 | Subs: 3
This thread is already a mistake
Isn't every balance thread turning into a mistake sooner or later? x)
Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13
Posts: 207
That's why KT has more hp and higher damage.
It itself also is supposed to have a backup of infantry.
And I completely fail to see how a tank having to fight tank destroyers which hardcounter it should be any issue here. If you are using all or nothing card, you need to be ready to lose it when opponent is prepared with correct counter, especially now that allied TDs are actually able to put a dent in its armor.
I know that the KT needs support, but that doesn't mean that it's scatter has to be so bad. Also I never said that the KT having to fight TDs was an issue, I was just stating a fact. Also the armor of the KT and the penetration of allied TDs wasnt changed recently, so im not sure why you are bringing up allied TDs ability to dent the KTs armor. The main thing that changed is that the Jackson got overbuffed.
Livestreams
 |
|
|
40 | ||
 |
|
|
23 | ||
|
|
|
|
11 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.830222.789+36
- 2.561204.733+3
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.916404.694-1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.721440.621+3
- 8.14758.717+1
- 9.17046.787-1
- 10.1019662.606+4
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
